Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)TH
Tankiedesantski [he/him] @ Tankiedesantski @hexbear.net
Posts
0
Comments
672
Joined
5 yr. ago

  • Ultimately, I feel the solution should lie more in educating consumers on financial literacy.

    You can crack down on predatory lending and educate consumers. However, you'll never be able to educate the average consumer to be immune from sophisticated schemes simply because most people have other things to do on life and scammers devote a lot more time creating new scams than the average person can devote to learning about avoiding scams.

  • Not at all. A rent to own scheme is essentially legally identical to getting a seller or third party loan except for when title passes over to the consumer. In most other respects, especially in outcome, it's the same transaction dressed up specifically to avoid existing usury laws.

    Even Rent4Keeps's own website calculates costs by comparing it to an installment loan for sale of goods. Doesn't get more transparent than that.

  • I'm not trying to attack you or anything. I'm not calling you a sexist and throughout this whole interaction I've given you maximal benefit of the doubt about your intentions.

    All I wanted to do is point out that this meme could be read to have an unintended negative meaning, a point which I don't think you've even disagreed with.

    If a big part of why this meme is okay to you is the fact that you're a woman in STEM them at least men should be aware that it might be interpreted differently if they share it or spread it around. It is, after all, a meme.

  • If 1) is true then taking a stand on 2) and 3) is pointless at best and callous at worst.

    Like you said, the joke works equally well with the genders reversed to remove the possibility of misinterpretation.

  • In 2021, China, the United States, the EU27, India, Russia and Japan remained the world’s largest CO2 emitters. Together they account for 49.2% of global population, 62.4% of global Gross Domestic Product, 66.4% of global fossil fuel consumption and 67.8% of global fossil CO2 emissions.

    Unless China annexed the US, the EU, India, Russia, and Japan and I just haven't gotten the memo yet...

    Source