I'm going to drill a bit deeper on this because I feel sympathy for people who are mired in systemic poverty, and stray into budget poverty in impulsive attempts to experience something nice.
It's the people who buy $50k vehicle they can't afford because they want to "fit in" that I have no sympathy for. For me it's not about Puritanical judgment over how tightly utilitarian someone ought to be, but whether or not someone went into poverty for the sake of conspicuous consumption.
The word "extreme" colours your question a fair bit. I think equality of all genders is good, I don't think anyone should be subject to unfair treatment based on gender. As a cis-het man I like to be in a relationship with a strong woman.
However, I dated someone for a while that probably fit into the "extreme" category. It was exhausting. I sometimes felt like I couldn't do anything without it being subjected to the question: "is this the patriarchy?" Like, she needed to hang some closet doors, had no tools, and I was like, "Oh, I can bring my drill over next week and do that!" That offer to help needed to be examined.
It also got annoying that workplace frustrations we both faced were always primarily parsed as "men being sexist" when it happened to her.
IMO often her "fierce conversations" were her being kind of dick about something.
Her model for independence and autonomy strayed very close to a refusal to take anyone else's needs into account. Her desire to treat everyone like they were equal ignored actual power differentials and the responsibility with which they come. For example, she argued she wouldn't put the booze away if someone she knew was an alcoholic was coming over because that would be patriarchal and robbing the alcoholic of their agency.
No. The Latin ending -ium designates that something comes from a place. Like, magnesium was originally found in Magnesia. Aluminia is not a place. It's name is derived from the Latin word 'alumen' for aluminum oxide.
This is what happens when you let people read the Bible in English.
Oh, I'm in the same boat. I was like, "$1000 for a 'smart' washer with shitty plastic parts or $2000 for a Speed Queen? I think if this washer breaks, I'm just going to buy the commercial washer." They last forever.
I'd like a pretty stripped down phone, and am intrigued by the concept of the Fair Phone. I looked at the Nothing Phone and the aesthetic is neat, but in the end it just seemed like different bells and whistles. It's like if I didn't want to wear fancy clothes, just simple working clothes. This looks like simple working clothes, but it's actual streetwear from a boutique.
Cars and devices: can we just get simple, repairable machines?
EDIT: houses, too. I'd rather plain and quality than fancy shit.
Privacy concerns have also kept me away. I'm a bit inconsistent in application, but Google and Microsoft has me considering FOSS alternatives, Linux, and Graphene OS.
I also have to maintain a profile for professional reasons, though I get someone else to manage our pages. I don't even know what it is, but I get anxiety within seconds of interacting with my feed, and I am NOT an anxious person. My ex is addicted to it. Sometimes I feel I lost her to FB and it's echo chambers if unaccountable validation.
Yes! First time I had hot pot was with a couple of exchange students. This was one of their dipping sauce ingredients. I've never been able to find it on my own. What's it called? I'd take a shot at making it myself. Also, what's the red stuff that goes in the sauce? I thought it was maybe fermented tofu. I'm pretty sure I've found that, but all of it has weird food coloring in it. I find I have to keep a lot of chemicals out of my food.
That was my first response: who has the money for cereal in this economy? I tell you what, Mr. Kellogg, if it's breakfast for dinner it's going to be toast or porridge. I'm certainly not overpaying for glorified dried, smashed frozen corn.
Vapours too.