Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)TA
Posts
3
Comments
592
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • It's pretty difficult, you need to get the rolling code from the fob, but you also need to jam it so it doesn't reach the car.

    Then you have one opportunity to replay the code before the holder of the fob hits the button in range and rolls the code over.

    So even if you manage to set that up that only gets you in the car, it doesn't get it started.

  • Imagine thinking you are superior because you said the word tea, as if tea isn't a famously high profile drink in the United States.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston_Tea_Party

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sweet_tea

    Seriously as an American, I don't know a single person who doesn't drink some type of tea.

    Y'all can keep downvoting, but iced tea and sweet tea are both hugely important cultural drinks in the United States, so implying that Americans haven't heard of tea is just wrong.

  • I'm sorry, but do you just talk to strangers on the subway?

    We already have smartphones that everyone is looking at anyway.

    Before that we had newspapers.

    You are making up an imaginary dystopia to peddle fear for no reason.

  • A radio station is a small selection of music curated by an individual and meant for the masses.

    Modern music streaming has dynamically curated music from a nearly infinite source, it's really not the same.

  • A bot can be very easily made to be effectively unstoppable in an fps, just look at hacking players.

    Just as a chess bot can be made dumb as a box of rocks.

    They just serve different purposes, for example in counter strike, bots are nerfed in purpose in order to discourage kicking other players to replace them with a bot that would do better.

    Chess bots are also the target of computer science researchers, very few if any, serious academics are focusing their time developing a bot for a game that is either a flash in the pan as far as popularity, or actively discouraged by the arbiters of the game.

  • I know more people that have died in car crashes (2, in separate instances, and one person that died in a motorcycle accident) than people who have died in plane crashes (0).

    But that doesn't actually matter, because a) anecdotal evidence means very little, if not nothing when considering the scale of transportation industries and b) the numbers don't lie. Since 1970, 85,555 people have died in fatal aviation incidents. Around 100,000 people die or are disabled in car accidents every single month.

    Your misunderstanding of statistics and probability and your idea that because the concept of a minor car accident exists, it nullifies the fact that they are dangerous, is just wrong.

  • No, but I do remember the advent of online ordering reducing the staff needed to answer phones and take orders at the counter at the pizza place I worked at.

    And now those same restaurants don't even staff drivers anymore, they outsource to door dash (who are now getting paid less, with less protections)

    Let's not pretend that technology improvements can't cause cascading changes in an industry.

  • Genuine question, since the code itself doesn't infringe on IP (I think) wouldn't the user executing the code be responsible for accepting the tos, not the repo.

    The repo is just static non-compiled text files, it afaik isn't actually communicating with their servers and therefore wouldn't be able to accept any tos (implied or otherwise) (I don't know if there are any actions, ci/cd pipelines, or deployments that would be in violation though)