Exactly, and that's also why it's so effective. You can say whatever lies you like if you only say them to the people who will lap it up, there's and no chance for anyone else to correct them as they don't even hear the lie.
Exactly. Tesla early adopters deserve to have a bumpy ride with it, but they don't deserve to be left out $70k or however much and not even have a working vehicle. They deserve a refund from the manufacturer who didn't provide a product fit for service.
Pretty sure the courts in Florida have also already ruled that what DeSantis did (taking money that was ringfenced for dealing with migrants in Florida and paying his friend's charter airline to fly migrants from Texas to Massachusetts) was illegal and a misappropriation of taxpayer funds.
That applies to private sales between individuals, not between manufacturers and consumers. The manufacturer has obligations to ensure what they claim is a true and honest representation of what they're selling.
The real irony here is that you're basically siding with and defending Telsa in terms of their legal disputes with their customers.
The OP article is about forum posts where people are publicly complaining about it. I bet if you go into those you'll find stories of abysmal customer service from Tesla, pushing repairs with ridiculously long wait times over refunds.
There comes a point the consumer is fully responsible for their decision.
At what point is that? Setting aside your opinions for this particular brand.
I don't think there should be anything that takes all the responsibility away from the seller and leaves it with the buyer. Particularly not with a purchase over $10k, let alone a new purchase direct from a manufacturer.
Essentially, the logical conclusion of what you're saying is that it's ok for people to scam people, so long as it was obviously a scam, in your opinion.
No, but saying they deserve what they get removes all responsibility from Tesla to actually deliver on their promises at the point of sale. Basic functionality is inherently one of those.
Of course Cybertruck buyers should be expected to have to put up with some crap for being early adopters of such obvious bullshit, but that doesn't mean they should have a truck that breaks down while driving away from the dealership.
This article doesn't just summarise the discussion on Proton's blog post (which the article linked to), it's looking to spread the information and increase discussion of the issue, in particular in the community of users who regularly browse their site and comments sections.
Your comment is like complaining about reposts. Yes, in the worst cases reposts can be bad and disruptive, but more often than not it's just a genuine attempt to spread the content/story further and one that introduces it to more people than the original. This isn't one of those worst case examples.
Articles like this are at least better than Yahoo or MSN articles that literally just copy the text of other publications (although sometimes the source article is paywalled while the copy is not).
You cannot use the new Outlook app without syncing these data with Microsoft's servers, i.e. your usernames and passwords are sent to the company's cloud servers. While the data is sent using TLS, the IMAP and SMTP username and password are sent to Microsoft in plain text. This could allow the company to access your emails, and share the data with third-parties.
Not only that, but sending usernames and passwords in plaintext allows for MITM attacks.
See now this is a good article about these legal proceedings. It actually explains the detail that isn't apparent to non-lawyers and gives an overview of the potential outcomes, rather than a retired lawyer just speculating and jerking themselves off over what might happen.
Ahmad said Biden’s opening remarks at the event did not mention Gaza, famine, or the potential invasion of Rafah.
The event was repurposed from a general celebration marking the end of Ramadan
This article is really trying to frame this as something more sinister than a publicity event being poorly attended and diverted off its intended course.
I made a simple comment showing my support to the admin, which after this experience I'm sure is much needed. You've come in here behaving like an ass with zero effort yourself - you were wrong, my comments have had far more value to the discussion than anything you've brought. I don't think the problem is the platform, I think the problem is you.
Dammit lmao the joke has stuck so hard I forget which one is the real one.