it’s possible to have an email client download all the messages from Gmail and remove them from the server.
I would like to set up a service on my servers to do that and then act as mail server for my clients. Gmail would still be the outgoing relay and the always-on remote mailbox, but emails would eventually be stored locally where I have plenty of space.
Do you really need this extra server? Why not just configure the account on Thunderbird and move the older / archival mail to a local folder? Or even drag and drop it out of Thunderbird to a folder and store the resulting files somewhere?
I'm just asking this because most people won't need regular access to very old email and just storing the files on a NAS or something makes it easier.
They're devices usually require a ui.com account and linking the device. As some people already said it you'll still require cloud connection to setup the device even if standalone by using their mobile or desktop app. Doesn't seem like a good choice for someone who's into privacy and self hosting.
It is somewhat sensitive, at least wireless device names, network/switch setup, MAC addresses and LED/ GPIO settings are going to be different - almost always (and this list is far from complete).
Usually what I do is I take the config and merge it manually (Beyond Compare), to the default config of a new unit, that way I can adjust the interfaces and other details.
To be fair I only do this because I tend to deploy OpenWRT on customers quite a lot and something I don't have a config for some specific hardware already done. A router is basically a fridge, it should last a long time and even if you've to manually configure everything it won't be much of an issue 5 or 10 years later.
At least he is honest about who he / the platform supports, not some shady algorithm pending to one side, or some tv channel being left while another is right lol
So what, people need cloud services and Netherlands did the same and became one of the top spot for datacenters in Europe and nobody is bitching around.
I've done my fair share of long runs of Cat6e 23 AWG with PoE and they all work fine and gigabit on distances like 100 meters or close. Sometimes even slightly above that.
Staggered will reduce the failure rate by a lot, specially if you're into gigabit speeds or anything above it. Although I know from experience that you can get gigabit on non-staggered connectors it won't always happen on the first try. On long distances the noise caused by having the wires side by side may also cause problems.
Btw, if you've small patch cables don't use solid core for those, those should be stranded cables and they'll be more flexible, less likely to break when bent and less prone to bad contacts.
CCA wasn't probably your issue there, CCA is actually becoming the standard everywhere because copper is way too expensive and to be fair not needed with modern hardware.
You most likely issue with that CCA is the AWG size you picked, cheap cable is usually 24, 26 or even 28 AWG and those will be bad.
If you want PoE or anything gigabit or above you need to pick 23 AWG. This is considerably cheaper than full copper and it will work fine for the max. rated 100m. Either way, cheap 26 AWG should be able to deliver gigabit and PoE at short distances like 20 meters or so.
Another important thing is to make sure your terminations are properly done and the plugs are good. Meaning, no Cat5e connectors should be used, always use staggered ones:
I've a run of around 60 meters of old telephone cables (made out of copper, 4 wires) and I can get 100Mbps on those reliably. I used the old telephone infrastructure on the building to pass network from an apartment to the basement that way.
Not to spec on ethernet on any way, not even twisted pairs but they do work. Unfortunately I can't replace the run with a proper Cat6 cable because there's a section that I can't find where it goes to, it just disappears on a floor and appears 2 floors bellow it inside the main telephone distribution box.
On the distribution box (that is already on the basement of the building) I'm plugging into the LSA connector that goes to the apartment:
The black box you see there is a mikrotik gper that is essentially a PoE switch with only 2 ethernet ports so I can get over the 100m limitation of ethernet. I'm running a cat6 cable from there on metal cable trays for about another 90 meters until it reaches a storage unit 2 floors bellow ground.
Here's a ping test from a machine sitting on the storage box to the router on the apartment:
The router reports this as a 100M full-duplex connection:
Yes but... tests are done in controlled environments and ideal conditions, there are big real world differences with CCA vs fully copper or those solid core options vs stranded ones. They'll all perform differently depending on distances, noise immunity will vary and will break differently in different ways when tension is applied. You can also get Cat5e on different AWG sizes, all spec compliant but all very different from each other.
The bottom line is: it all comes down to how much you're willing to spend.
Yeah and don't forget good terminations. I've seen a lot of people not getting the speeds they could get just because they used cheap plugs/connectors.
Oh the app store with 3 apps is back.