SufferingSteve @ SufferingSteve @feddit.nu

Posts

2

Comments

54

Joined

5 mo. ago

Everybody should slam that, not only experts

Wow, actually really cool usecase and tech!

Imagine if this was the norm for news, what an utopia.

Instead history and facts are whatever the AI tells us

The bad thing about those kind of shows, is that while most people see that as a warning, and something to avoid.

Some people immediately start charting a path to how to make it a reality, and sometimes those people are very very smart and can chart a path that might take decades.

I say this while on the toilet, writing on a device that has cameras both front and back, always on microphones and location sensors, and facial recognition and 3D scanning equipment.

When the personalized condom ads start popping up, I will only be slightly annoyed.

I'm in this comment, and I don't like it

Why the annoying music...

If you sit in a room and you can see the bars, you know you are trapped, if you sit in a room, but you cant see the bars, you are going to think you are free

It really is, knowingly supporting someone who is openly evil, is obviously worse than unknowingly supporting someone who is evil, but tries to hide it.

We should not let people be openly evil, it just feels like a real stupid move.

An app?

I don't understand what you want said with that statement, that two party systems are better? Just as good as multi party systems? That they are all bad so you should just take your pick and be happy?

Dude, you forgot that it had built in led control. We all should know by know that gaming = leds

Yeah, you are not even paying for minutes yet

Two party systems spells doom. It enforces us vs them.

It's the first indicator that something is wrong with the democratic system. Basically, democracy requires multiple opinions and have to be more nuanced than yes/no, or party1/party1. It has to be a discussion amongst the currently elected parties until an acceptable solution for the majority of members is reached. Thus only having two opposing parties will basically crumble democracy, since the discussion, the basis of democracy will not happen, and the minority will always loose.

I like the idea, but I don't really feel this is scoring decentralization at all.

Yeah,looking through this again, it really scores centralization, and also focuses way to much on ease of setup. Which honestly has nothing to do with it. If it's super hard to setup, but every participant is hosting their own node. And producing the same amount of content. That would be max decentralization.

I would also argue that a requirement for decentralization is that the service keeps working even if a large portion of all nodes goes down, the remaining nodes are still operational and keep delivering the value.

Maybe they would act as a uniting force? :D

For a good reason

This is the weirdest commercial :P

Too accurate

The thin layer of civility is right out the window when online.

Those darn lazy engineers. I mean the entire thing is basically done as you can see from the picture!

Those darn engineers just have to put it in that box and make it move, what's the big deal. Slowpokes