SuddenlyBlowGreen @ SuddenlyBlowGreen @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

320

Joined

2 yr. ago

Have you ever had a good boss?

Yes.

How is it that much different from now?

My corrent boss can't beat me with a rod as long as I don't die in a few days.

They are your master and you are their slave, until you choose to end employment or they set you free, which that's the only difference in the current vs "traditional" slavery.

A pretty damn big difference.

Most of the time, it'll be better for the "slave" to be true and loyal to their master.

Having said that, the laws of a nation are what they are and those are what the state should follow, and those ought to be enforced for all its citizens without preference to any particular group.

So you'd be against the slaves rising up against their masters?

The morality that the Bible teaches is simply the most correct for all of human history.

Glad you're at least pro-choice.

Hmm, I wonder...

You didn't answer my question.

Who would pay for the platform, and who would moderate it? Or do you just want even more hate speech to spread?

"Slaves, obey your earthly masters with respect and fear, and with sincerity of heart, just as you would obey Christ."

Ephesians 6:5-8

"Slaves, obey your earthly masters in everything; and do it, not only when their eye is on you and to curry their favor, but with sincerity of heart and reverence for the Lord."

Colossians 3:22-24

"Teach slaves to be subject to their masters in everything, to try to please them, not to talk back to them"

Titus 2:9-10

“Slaves, be subject to your masters with all reverence, not only to those who are good and equitable but also to those who are perverse.”

Peter 2:18

Yeah, we should definitely get our morals from a book that supports slavery.

don't shame others for wanting a clean dick.

Or you could just wash it. Like normal people.

Do you also support scalping for wanting a clean head?

A public forum, I assume paid for and maintained by the taxes of the public?

Ah, so you're pro moderation when you personally find the contect to be even indirectly harmful.

"Double standards are bad, no matter which side."

Why should anyone get to own the only effective avenues of communication? Communication is what determines how the world works.

Who currently owns the "only effective avenues of communication"?

CP is illegal obviously, and jihad doesn't make sense in the cute cats category the way 'straight only game mod' makes sense in the 'game mod' category.

"Sometimes you gotta put up with some ugly if you don't want people silenced for their perspective." Seems there's a limit to the ugly you're willing to put up with, and you're quite willing to silence perspectives yourself.

You cleaely still want people to moderate social networks. I assume you'd want these people to outside the company?

Whoa, that's not very professional or acceptable :-)

Major media outlets and companies should not be considered private platforms.

Really? Now I'm curious, how do you imagine that?

I assume the company still pays for the platform, hosting, development, etc. Since it's public, are they now subsidised by taxes?

Who moderates the platforms then? Are is it all just unmoderated?

Will companies get compansated for lost revenue?

I genuinely curious how you imagine this working.

Anyone can sign up and post while they use their money and influence to decide who gets heard.

Yeah, because it's theirs. They own it.

If I let everyone into my house for a party, doesn't mean I lose the right to kick people out.

Sometimes you gotta put up with some ugly if you don't want people silenced for their perspective. I don't want an echo chamber.

I'm okay with an echo chamber if it means I don't have to put up with CP and jihadi execution footage in my cute cat feed.

I assume it would be no problem for you.

Watch protectandserve and other such xommunitiea defend this shit.

Disgusting.

Okay, have fun a work tomorrow! Or don't, as that seems to be your preference. :-)

No, but you can't forcibly take and use someone else's megaphone.

So private platform and private parties shouldn't have the right to moderate and regulate their own spaces?

Maybe. Maybe it's a "We can't afford to alienate expensive engineers over stickers" thing, or a "We care more about the quality of work than sticks on laptops" thing.

Must be a fun place you work at. Do you wear a suit to work and work in cubicles?

The people of "the party of pro-life", trying to spread plague.

You can't make this shit up.

Did you work with engineers?

Okay, let's not jump the gun, we don't have all the context here.

The inmate has a family to go home to, they're also human.

Don't try to fight the inmate, just comply, you can fight them in court.

I've heard Chauvin was on drugs, and the stab wounds were a pre-existing condition.

You're using HTTPS, do you have child porn?

Yes Jeff!

If they're technically inclined enough to run an installer and log in to google/apple, then they can do it, or you can do it for them.

That said, your case is valid. I just dislike my services dangling out without proper security, unless they're designed for it, and plex's auth model rubs me the wrong way.