SuddenlyBlowGreen @ SuddenlyBlowGreen @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

320

Joined

2 yr. ago

I guess I'm just wrong for expecting a newer and pricier phone to be actually better than the previous, cheaper one.

I guess apple does things differently.

What?

It's pretty obvious that Gen. Milley is wearing a wig, and what do you think he's hiding below that wig?

My guess would be an M1A1 Abrams, painted in blue, pink and white.

Gen. Milley's preferred pronoun is Xe, so put some respect on that shit.

And if those idiots are going to keep up with this 'military woke' shit, Gen. Milley is going identify as a fucking/problem.

That's not a personal attack. What was the abusive remark I directed at your person? I was agreeing with you:

"I agree with you completely we should de-platform everybody you don't like. Could you send a list over to the ISP? We'll get on it right now"

That would require him to be able to read, unfortunately...

Why the personal attack? Haven't we been having a civil discourse? Have I not respected your position and arguments?

Please tell me what actions and conduct I've demonstrated in this discussion that warrant's your ire and insults?

I'll be happy to, if you actually point me to any personal attack I made against you.

"Yeah, just pay for another subscription service because the build quality of your new $1000+ flagship device is so shit it will shatter if you drop it and you'll need to replace the whole thing"

It's a bold move to use someone's logic and reason as a impeachment of their character.

So you shouldn't use somebody's actions and conduct to judge their character?

Could you send a list over to the ISP? We'll get on it right now

Sure, let's start with jet@hackertalks.com.

But solar farms are communism! /s

Yeah, well when you're so delusional you think climate change doesn't exist, 10 year old rape victims should be forced to give birth and LGBTQ people who are oppressed deserve it, you're less unhappy about the state of the country.

If you view them as utilities, like the water company and the power company, then they have to be forced to provide equal services for equal pay to all people.

To businesses too? Are water and power companies forced to provide services to any and all businesses?

I'm not sure they'd get doxed, we know it's Andrew Tate after all, but they would get DDoSed.

Well, I assume he's not the only one to participate on his forum or website.

Plus his fans tend to be the kind of people who tell you they're his fans.

I'm not concerned about the ones that do, I'm concerned about the ones that don't.

They're not exactly hiding

But you wouldn't know about the ones hiding, because they would be... hiding.

But if you view internet service providers, as common carriers, i.e. telecommunition utilities - then yes they should be forced to, unless it's illegal.

Forced to how exactly? This isn't forcing a company to provide water for an individual, this is forcing a company to provide non-essential services to a business.

Can the provider raise prices? Can they change their contract? Are they forced to provide these services in perpetuity?

But let's say the unpopular app is self hosting its own website, serving its own PWA from its own servers, as long as there isn't a court order, I don't think utilities should shut them down.

Oh, that would be great actually, I hope they do that.

That way, they'll get doxed within 5.2 seconds of the app going live and everybody will know the people on the app.

Should the service providers that host PWAs and their databases be forced to serve them if their content violates their policies?

Exactly, both sides should be heard.

One sides says that women should be able live without being in constant fear of assault and harassment, and the other says that women are pieces of meat , to be used and thrown away.

Both have equal merit, and should definitely be in public discourse.

A very distinguised old gentleman.

Hey, that's two steps of logic, that's cleary too much for them.

So like how the iPad has no calculator feature?

The kind that's actually correct?

Damn.

Yeah, that would make me dislike it too.

    
let mut scheduler = Scheduler::with_tz(chrono::Utc);

scheduler.every(10.minutes()).plus(30.seconds()).run(|| println!("Periodic task"));

scheduler.every(1.day()).at("3:20 pm").run(|| println!("Daily task")); 

scheduler.every(Tuesday).at("14:20:17").and_every(Thursday).at("15:00").run(|| println!("Biweekly task")); 

  

Damn, that a really ingenious and intuitive use of the builder pattern.

Kudos to the devs!