Steve @ Steve @communick.news

Posts

2

Comments

1,335

Joined

2 yr. ago

Everything.

What's the alternative? Nothing?
That seems really booring.

Harvard saying they wouldn't comply with Trump and fight it in court was great.

If they really wanted to do "The Right Thing", they have the billions to keep these projects funded for several years while they fight. But I guess that's too much to ask.

Yes. Contrary to current pop-sci thought, it's not actually useless bunk. Epically when differences reach into 2 digits.

Springsteen should double down.
"I heard some overgrown pumpkin with tiny hands wants me to shut up! Fuck that moron!"

See what Rump does then.

This would be interesting.
That would mean if you are training an AI model at home, you can copy any movie show or music you want, legally.

Both parties are in the pocket of the ownership class.
The Democrats seriously would rather see the republic fall to a pro corpo dictatorship, than do anything to address wealth inequality.

Just days ago didn't he lament how terrible autism is, how destructive it is to whole families? Now he wants to take support away from those families? Being wrong is one thing, this is self contradictory nonsense.

Still sounds more like a browser problem.
Have you tried different browsers?
Which browser are you using?

The answer to your direct question, I don't know.

But the issue you're having seems more a browser thing to me. It's the browser that warns you if you try to leave a page with an uncompleted form or text box.

The headline seems to imply something wrong is happening.

The options they got when hired finally matured, now they can sell them. With the share price cratering for things they can't control (Musk being a dick) who wouldn't just cash out? It's the only thing worth doing in that situation.

Why couldn't he simply say: "Yah we made a mistake. After 2 years people still call it HBO or HBO Max. It's our strongest, most popular brand of content. So we're giving the people what they want, and going back."

He's in a different room than we are.

Of course if one truly can't afford it, paying for search can seem a luxury.

However I would argue as a counterpoint; If there's any online service one would consider paying for, it should be search. Search is most literally our "front page to the internet". It's our first stop in any quest for information. Even the founders of Google knew early on, that putting adds in search creates a perverse incentive against the best results, favoring instead worse results, so people perform more searches, creating more opportunities to show people adds.

$5 a month isn't much to know your query will give the results you want, instead of the results advertisers want.

I'd be quite surprised if this turns out to be crap. It'll be fun at least

I don't know the details of exactly what and how it works. But "Parental Controls" is what you want to search for in the settings.

That's not really at issue here.
This isn't the government deciding what art is objectionable, and arresting those who play music they don't like. This is a private company deciding what it wants to host in it's library, that it curates, it pays license fees for, and sells subscriptions too. Ye or any Nazi absolutely has the right to make and sell any music they want. They however don't have the right to force another company to sell their music for them.

Most negotiations are based on vibes.
It's why I hate (and often refuse) to negotiate.

It surprising how much push back, and how many down votes I got from people here, when I said that more than a year ago.
I'm glad now in hind sight it's apparently obvious to everyone.

Haven't been able to find a copy of Big Shark by Tommy Wiseau.

That's what I did.

This Silicon Carbon battery chemistry I've learned works different Lithium Ion. SC likes to be charged to 100%. So I've been fully charging each night on a slow 15W charger. So far so good.