That's not really how it works. If it was made to work that way, it would still be a relatively small group donating their own compute resources to subsidize everyone else. Which is what we already have, and isn't very scalable.
The only real option is to charge people.
Hosting isn't free. It costs money to run a website. That money needs to come from somewhere. If it doesn't come from advertisers, it must come from users.
There could be a verity options for that. But I like the simple annual subscription. Each and every user pays. Spread out the cost as much as possible. It's only fair.
Honestly issue #1 has "Mole Man and his Moloids: An underground leader of Subterranea, who plans to take over the outer world that rejected him. Rules over different creatures and has access to highly advanced technology." That could be a fun place to start.
Honestly it always bums me out a little when movies like this go straight to their biggest villain or story. They should start smaller and build to the big stuff.
Yes! You're right!
Selling access to the algo directly would be terrible for users. The SEO companies would all know exactly how to game the system, and ruin Google search completely. That would be soooo bad.
Google CEO Sundar Pichai seemed genuinely alarmed at the prospect of being forced to license Google’s search index and algorithm
This is almost exactly what Kagi suggested.
The hardest part of internet search is building the search Index. It's massive. Practically a whole copy of the internet. Selling other provider access to Google's search index means new businesses and new business models can be created. My only concern is the "and algorithm" part. That almost sounds like the current state of things. Where companies can run queries to google and receive standard results filtered by Google's algorithm. Direct access to the index is needed without Google's algorithm, so others can use their own algorithm. But maybe they meant and/or, so companies can choose to be a real "Google white label" or something more.
I'm still not sure I understand exactly. Are you asking about individual autonomy, or the collective autonomy of humanity?
I would say there's no real difference on an individual level. I guess conceptually, humanity as a collective entity, might loose autonomy. But I'm not sure that matters.
CanvasBlocker works well for that.