British Wikipedian, Stuart Marshall, made the final ruling in September, decisively supporting the article’s inclusion. “Based on the strength of the arguments … and it’s not close … I discarded the argument that scholars haven’t reached a conclusion on whether the Gaza genocide is really taking place”, Marshall wrote in his decision. “The matter remains contested, but there’s a metric truckload of scholarly sources linked in this discussion that show a clear predominance of academics who say that it is.”
This election is a test: Can the American public resoundingly reject a man who has not merely been a chaotic extremist but has also attacked the American system of republican government itself?
The Pyramids of Egypt were not constructed with slave labor. Archaeological evidence shows that the laborers were a combination of skilled workers and poor farmers working in the off-season with the participants paid in high-quality food and tax exemptions. The idea that slaves were used originated with Herodotus, and the idea that they were Israelites arose centuries after the pyramids were constructed.
Not really terminology, but I would recommend trying to engage in good faith when discussing more complex issues on Lemmy. Keep your eyes peeled for trolls who are not open minded and block them once they show they're unreceptive to civil discussion. Since the userbase is rather small, it works extremely well and makes your experience so much better.
Naw, they will only persue after the election. No way would they risk displeasing their potential king. Especially if he is saying he will throw more tax breaks their way.
Pretty smart move actually. If Harris wins, the legal action will continue regardless of who he voted for. If trump wins and he finds out that Rudy voted against him, that would arguably be worse for him.
Basically, Goodrazi got touchy when asked about his organization's efforts to neutralize government-spearheaded free tax filing programs. He hit back that Patel's question — the editor said that Intuit is "legendary for lobbying against free direct federal e-filing" and then straightforwardly asked how much of their budget is allocated towards lobbying efforts — was "fundamentally" based in the "wrong premise" and was "inaccurate," before declaring that Intuit doesn't "lobby against free."
Don't worry, according to undecided/centrists, it is all metaphorical and the news is just fear mongering. Trump wouldn't ACTUALLY do what he said he will.
To clarify, this is not an undermining or comparison of both conflicts. This is more so to provide an alongside image to hold news stations accountable for what they determine as "crossing a line".