You throw so much stuff into this. I don't feel like writing an essay. Especially since you already brushed over the important parts and then bring up minorities. I literally don't care about minorities when it's about a swastika. Indian managed to add four dots or inverted it. And there are so tiny fractions of minorities of them here, that it doesn't matter. The very same with the fox gesture. At very most you see it at a baby metal concert and that's about it.
Yes we still have neo Nazis showing up, but exactly because of people like you. Who gave them room. Who allowed them to group up. Who didn't deny them spreading their hate. I have very very little sympathy if the removal of those rights does touch a tiny minority. It's not a tolerance paradox that you fabricate.
write better laws
What a joke of a reply. That's exactly what they do, forbid ideology symbols. So people don't watch TV or go on the streets and see these extremist group symbols and they themselves feel recognized and welcome. You're out of your mind if you believe this has no effect. Stop protecting Nazis and other fascism by throwing unimportant culture into it. You do know what Nazis want? They screw your history and culture. If this little bit of, losing a hand gestures, is too much to show a big fuck you to those extremist, then you're just a hidden supporter.
What other law, than making this perticular symbol illegal, is there to do? All the other things are already not allowed. You have yet to be precise. Because you don't have a solution!
You don't do this right away and not for everything the extremists touch. But There's a good reason why swastika and Nazi salut are illegal. The silent fox gesture isn't that new.
So far I've only read "we can't forbid it", so what? Make an offer then how to solve it. I'm all ear.
Certainly not letting them spread their propaganda is goal here. The extremist aren't helped here by forbidden the hand sign because everyone who is no longer using it was using it in good intention before, knows why not to use it any longer. It's that simple.
It's time to considering another way to tackle extremism than to ban symbol and hand sign.
There's no other way and it's important to ban extremism. The importance to not give room to Nazi like ideologies is bigger than people no longer doing fox hand gestures in public.
Sucks but so it is with a lot of laws, a lot of people aren't the problem it's the few that are.
Also, so far we've been very successful banning these symbols. The US, not so much and look how well this works out.
If the issue of misuse appears more prominent in Asia, I'm sure they'll act the same way and ban it.
Pretty good. Only two multiplayer games in the silver area that I might play once every 3-5 years. The rest I don't care about. But overall very good if one doesn't care about multiplayer games.
Thanks for pointing it out. I always write "the Ukraine" because it's how we write it in my native language. I didn't even know in English the article is used for non sovereign counties. It's really hard to avoid the extra article here, as in for example German, we use "the Ukraine" exclusively, as it's female. It's the same with the Netherlands, the Turkey, the Switzerland. Never even heard before this could imply denying sovereignty.
Thanks, I hope I remember this if this ever is relevant to me.