I never said anything even vaguely approaching that?
What do you even mean by "told me from the beginning what he wants to do"? If I'm prepping a fantasy campaign and one of my players tells me, "I'd kinda prefer we do something sci-fi" then I have no obligation to change my entire campaign because a player isn't happy with it. I might still do it, if I felt interested in running that and the rest of the table does too, but imo I'm well within my rights to tell him no.
If you mean that he wants a plotline of his own then I'd do my best to accommodate that, assuming it doesn't clash with the rest of the campaign horribly. If it does, then I'd just say that and offer alternatives if I can think of any. If I can't, then of course he can still play if he'd like.
I hate this take a lot, I'm gonna be honest. I don't care if his game is so on rails that it's set on the fucking orient express. As long as the players are having fun with the game, and the GM is having fun with the game.. that's a good GM.
Ime, players are entirely willing to accept an extremely short session just so I can prep and set back up after they throw me a massive curveball. If you're capable of doing it on the fly, that's great, but I'm not and my players usually understand.
Had a twelve minute session once because I forgot I gave the party a foldable boat like three months ago on a whim, and they used it to skip the next ~3 sessions of content. I had an entire thing setup where they'd help a dwarfhold hunt a dragon, and had started on some city-based intrigue in the next area.
I just leveled with them that I had not even slightly expected this session to go this way and had nothing prepped so we'd stop early and pick it up next time.
Nintendo informed Sony they had cancelled their SNES-CD add-on by announcing an SNES-CD add-on made by Philips. At the Consumer Electronics Show. After Sony’s big presentation about their SNES-CD add-on.
Sony really ended up winning with that one in the long run, though.
Swapping entirely to renewable energy is cool and all but not as easy as "just use a bunch of solar panels???" The issue is that most renewables are some mix of a: unreliable, and b: geographical.
Wind isn't going to be blowing 24/7 in most places, so wind is unreliable. The sun isn't always shining in most places, so solar power is unreliable. Hydro is amazing if you have it, but it isn't the kind of thing you can just build anywhere. Geothermal is also great if you have it, but again isn't the kind of thing you can just build.
Meanwhile, the power grid requires reliability. It's incredibly important. The obvious kneejerk response is "but batteries?" which would work and all but you're basically suggesting we produce enough power during the day to cover usage overnight, which is a tall order. There's also the fact that the kind of battery banks we're talking about would be ruinously expensive, and probably some amount of dangerous.
Also, like other people have said: coal/gas are cheap and ubiquitous. Both of those words might as well be synonyms for 'more money'. Realistically, that's the primary reason.
Reinstalling windows is hardly a laborious task most of the time, but even then my main point was that buying a 32GB SSD is pointless when you can get much larger ones for extremely cheap. Even if you don't use it as a boot drive, more fast storage is never going to be a downside.
You could add an SSD specifically to serve as a pagefile location and nothing else, in which case you could just get a small cheap one (a 32GB SSD would be more than enough for 16GB of RAM)
Honestly, assuming OP isn't somewhere that the market for PC parts is extremely wonky compared to the US, if you're going to get an SSD you might as well go ahead and get one big enough to serve as a boot drive. A 256gb SATA SSD is ~$20, and should be fine for that purpose. It probably won't have DRAM at that price point, but realistically it's not really necessary and still going to be a night and day upgrade over an HDD.
You're right- when it works Destiny 2 absolutely works. Plus there's very little that fits the niche it's in, honestly. PvE shooters with that kind of replayability aren't incredibly common.
That was my biggest issue with it- the FOMO, but it's not nearly as bad as it was. At least it doesn't seem like it. Maybe they'll still prove me wrong. I've only been playing again for a month or so.
But I stopped playing around Shadowkeep, and I got everything since (so I think four or five expansions) for like $35. Which is a solid value considering I mostly just wanted to play the campaigns, and do some funny builds.
Okay, so: is it because you reasonably expect that from your friend? Have they given you reason to expect these things? Or is it more just an anxiety thing? Like, you know it's not a reasonable fear, but your brain still won't let go?
If A: no, that's not normal and he's hella toxic. Especially the online anonymity thing- what the fuck?
If B: no, that's not exactly normal but anxiety is a bitch sometimes.
The part of your skin that actually causes your fingerprint is relatively deep into your skin. So it'd need to be a pretty serious injury to permanently change your fingerprint at all.
I never said anything even vaguely approaching that?
What do you even mean by "told me from the beginning what he wants to do"? If I'm prepping a fantasy campaign and one of my players tells me, "I'd kinda prefer we do something sci-fi" then I have no obligation to change my entire campaign because a player isn't happy with it. I might still do it, if I felt interested in running that and the rest of the table does too, but imo I'm well within my rights to tell him no.
If you mean that he wants a plotline of his own then I'd do my best to accommodate that, assuming it doesn't clash with the rest of the campaign horribly. If it does, then I'd just say that and offer alternatives if I can think of any. If I can't, then of course he can still play if he'd like.