SoftestSapphic @ SoftestSapphic @lemmy.world

Posts

18

Comments

1,667

Joined

6 mo. ago

That's why we just target the people with the most money and power and drag them down to our mortal world.

The current one is the Xbox Seriez Z4 pro classic

Cmon keep up

Don't worry, soon China will have their boot on the neck of the world, and then every conversation will be about China!

It will take a fundamentally different algorithmic approach to make further progress in ML.

We have never figured out a different approach since it's inception in the 60s

I agree that being young makes you less likely to RESPOND to a survey.

What we are talking about is the results of a survey that shows you it compensated for that bias by making sure they reached enough people in every demographic on all parts of the political spectrum.

They are reaching enough genz to know the genz opinion, i promise you, if you need it proven to you please go to the paper and read the methodology for the survey

Well this is the most official data we get every election year about the political leanings of non voters.

And eveelection year before 2024 they were able to get accurate results with just 1,000 surveys. There's even an except that they got 9x the sample size to excessively make sure they were accurate.

So do you have any evidence to imply that willingness to respond to a survey has anything to do with political orientation?

You being incapable of accepting valid data has nothing to do with what you typed.

If you can't accept reality then you're going to find yourself making the same mistakes as Republicans.

You intentionally misread, that's so fucking disrespectful.

The Pew Research Center is not a news organization, and is controlled by a nonprofit.

"The Pew Charitable Trusts is an independent non-profit, non-governmental organization (NGO), founded in 1948."

If you would like to name a more credible US based polling org i challenge you to do so, i haven't seen one.

If find it's a bigger problem when people are presented with valid credible data and then still refuse to accept reality.

This thread consists of people in denyal about a survey that was conducted by the most credible organization that could have done it.

These were bias controlled groups of voters and non voters, this has nothing to do with voting machines

Well your opinion is wrong.

They are as credible as the Associated Press.

The control group is 9 times larger than when they usually do these surveys.

Sample size is not an issue, learn to accept reality

I think it was pretty perceptive of people that they can notice us being trapped in a slow decline and voting for chaos to get us off this path for better or worse.

Same thing happened in 2016. When people are disillusioned they vote for change, when the Democrats don't offer positive change then they vote for the Republicans who always cause negative change.

The sample size for this survey was 9 times more than usual.

This is accurate data.

This was the Pew Research Center, the most credible polling organization in the US, and in the article it explains how they compensate for potential biases.

They even surveyed 9 times the usual sample size to make sure this was a legitimate trend.

The article is from NPR, the most credible news outlet in the US.

People need to snap out of this denial that the US didn't willingly vote in a fascist because we were sick of stagnation

A lot of them are plain cloths

I would say showing a badge, and them waiting patiently while you can call in to confirm their legitimacy with their org.

The precedent tho is that anyone who identifies as law enforcement is supposed to be believed.

People are impersonating ICE all the time these days, its reasonable to not believe someone is an ICE agent based on word alone. If a person killed an ICE agent assuming he was an imposter then a judge might not throw the book at them, considering our current climate.