When an country forces its citizens to follow a state-mandated religion or else face death or severe punishment, and enacts laws that severely limit its citizens' freedom in the name of their chosen state religion, is it really considered "edgy" to be against it? I dunno, being against tyranny doesn't sound like something exclusive to atheists. The tyranny being religious in nature doesn't change that.
If your definition of "sane" is authoritarian bootlicking and swallowing Eastern propaganda like it's candy, sure. Say, I wonder what'll happen if you try criticizing China, Russia or North Korea on your instance?
Kaboom is a regular poster on the conservative community on Lemmy and also an actual fascist. Is it really at all surprising they're complaining about it?
A lot of people just call every siren an "air raid siren" even though no siren has been built for that purpose in 40 years in North America lol. It's entirely possible they had an actual air raid siren at one point, probably built by Canadian Line Materials.
As a siren enthusiast, I love when towns still carry on the traditional noon siren blasts. That doesn't happen much here in Ontario anymore.
FYI, Milo's siren isn't an air raid siren, small sirens like Milo's (a Federal Model 2 in this case) are typically fire sirens used to summon volunteer firefighters to the station during a fire call. Milo's is on the fire department, so it's probably the fire siren. They're usually tested daily or weekly to make sure they work when needed.
You're arguing with antiyanks again, btw. Don't bother with any accounts made within the past few days as chances are it's just them on a new account. It's almost their 40th ban now.
Corpo-speak in general is absolutely frustrating to read.