SnipingNinja @ SnipingNinja @slrpnk.net

Posts

1

Comments

757

Joined

2 yr. ago

I read that and I assumed they meant blocked from continuing that specific conversation not that they couldn't start a new chat and bring that topic up again

Hey, not knowing something isn't wrong. It isn't illiteracy to not have read whatever that is related to, remember the xkcd comic on today's 10,000. I also only read the quote on lemmy.

Now their response is not the best of course.

Yes

I have heard that the banana candy flavour is based on that and have really wanted to try it ever since and I hope we can preserve it for future generations too.

I'm curious about what they mean by that? Coz I haven't heard of anyone being blocked at all, but not only that I have not seen anyone have any issues for asking such questions. What they might have meant is the chat ended? If they actually got blocked that's entirely new to me and I would like to see some proof.

Can we get rid of that gene in Gros Michel too?

Waymo and cruise are already on some roads without any human drivers

That's a brilliant sentence, I had to reread it to get what you were saying

I'm surprised by the number of workaholics that exist, like why do you want to work so much? Go explore the world, learn things, make things, but people want to work instead?

This is brilliant

Yeah, I was responding the same as how others are trying to look at it from an actual leftist perspective, but you're right about the artist's intent most likely

That would mean he's somewhat of a plan for the crash, this is uncontrolled

It looks more like aptera

Edit: actually no, that one has the single wheel in the rear instead of front

No, no getting old, staying young forever instead for me

Maybe the porn is supposed to be ethical compared to the wild west of the internet (comparatively)

They said the scandal was that it was consensual not that it was not, so your examples aren't the opposite.

Though of course the power dynamics in the Clinton case makes the consent a bit iffy.

!I expect that to happen, but I don't think we have artificial intelligence yet, I hold onto that. As someone else commented we're on the calculator portion of the language tree but using language has always been what separated us from other beings so some people thought of it as the proof of intelligence but it never was. It's much easier to design something specialized than something actually intelligent (much easier here still means very fucking hard) but some people have gone onto calling this narrow intelligence and if it can do!<

As I was writing the above crossed out comment I did come to see your pov more closely and I guess in a way you're right, if we consider it narrow intelligence in terms of understanding and using language, because it is really good at language tasks but we expect artificial intelligence to be perfect for some reason and idk if that's right or not and that also might be what bothers you about the shifting goalposts.

By new how new are we talking? Because I haven't tested them in a couple months but it has failed logic questions I gave it before

I think that might be deliberate, make you feel terrible so you don't question how it works

Aah, yes, that does happen. I personally think it's a result of trying to apply their lived experience to a place so separate from theirs it might as well be a different continent (/j)

It's an issue with the whole internet tbh, we as a society might not be as used to a global world as we'd like and that creates friction and troubles even when we agree on the larger point.