Also, your fixation here is on pennies and not dollars. Large systems account for waste and allow for less precise action. They do that because they know that enables less logistical slowdown on average and overall they will be more successful in big picture.
As you grow, you'll learn to focus on broad strategy and not get lost in fixation on individual tactics. Set good policy and allow people room within to figure it out - without a bummer of a nag in middle management meandering around trying to save pennies at the cost of dollars to justify their existence.
Doesn't matter what you think really though, right? These businesses operate on measurable KPIs and if overall thresholds weren't being hit, something would happen.
If you were a manager with that attitude, you'd be a micro manager and we all know that that type of manager, in any sector, SUCKS.
Yes, and speaking to quality in this case is not about individual performances, it's about overall quality of outcome. Are you familiar with Pareto?
Stop fixating on Janice in accounting scrolling facebook and how you feel slighted by her or Derek in operations who shows up 30 minutes late to meetings. The bigger machine on government side works most of the time, with transparent accountability, on that side, in the case of insurance, it emotionlessly kills people for profit on the other.
Hey!!! DON'T YOU DARE call it a far off shithole!!!! That is the place were I get the underaged nannies that I get pregnant from! These are the undocumented mothers of some of the children I don't care about as much as my "on the books" kids, but they have my DNA - so have some fucking respect!
Actually, I sense a little jealously as you've probably realized that I can/will be able to farm all of these tier 2 children's organs eventually to extend the life of my pure A-tier family. Green does not look good on you, buddy!
You're argument here is quantity over quality - "these people kill a lot of other people with those decisions, sure... but they make those heavy decisions lightly and quickly and often with an algorithm! That FEELS impressive to me because I'm a toddler that responds to kinetic stimulus for the sake of it and I can't see any nuance!"
Also, part of what you're talking about is by design - Republicans shoot their constituents in the feet so those people can then have foot pain to complain about. Then, when complaining gets vocal, the gop politicians come in and say "we need to just get government away from your feet and they'll be less painful" ---- They are the "government" that shot you and you are the constituent with a hole in your foot.
Luigi, I can forgive a lot, but shareholder value... How could you, man?
How am I supposed to tell my kids about his when they are back from the character building camp I sent them to where they were hunting lesser human beings for sport in an eastern European country I won't name? This is really going to crush their big, delicate hearts...
Sure, but I think you'd understand that I can't just take pure speculation though. Could you please source your claim so I can consider what you're saying when you say he "took Russia's side".
Would also be curious of the state he was in while saying that if true, as he's nearly 100 years old at this point if I recall? Even our heroes get frail and wither, not necessarily representative of their true core positions.
Whatever the message is, it just won't reach. The money is so disproportionate from progressive voices to conservative voices. There was a bubble chart referenced in a Walter Masterson video describing social reach for right versus left, just so lopsided, the truth can't win anymore. You can have the mist compelling message from the most compelling person on the left, doesn't reach.
Snapz @ Snapz @lemmy.world Posts 13Comments 2,307Joined 2 yr. ago
"I'm with stupid" shirts