Skip Navigation

π•Šπ•žπ•’π•”π•œπ•–π•ž π•Žπ•šπ•₯π•₯π•’π••π•šπ•”
π•Šπ•žπ•’π•”π•œπ•–π•ž π•Žπ•šπ•₯π•₯π•’π••π•šπ•” @ SmackemWittadic @lemmy.world
Posts
0
Comments
349
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • You know a comic has reached legendary status when "Bobby Tables" is the first thing to come to mind for so many of us

  • Very simple reason why:

    He's not better than this, simply because he would rather have this insane amount of wealth and NOT use it to aid people.

    I hate bezos for that, I hate musk for that, and I hate Zuckerberg for that. Musk gets more hate for all the actions he has taken to benefit himself and the other billionaires. He has so much more blood on his hands than that United Healthcare CEO, and I am very much okay with what happened to that guy

  • Man I don't even think step two would happen before trump pardons them. The US is so fucked.

    EDIT: As an example of what you said, a sociopath who has recently bought a Tesla is the fucking president of the US

  • That's the imperial system for ya. Imagine using a dude's feet as a form of measurement. That's weirder than having it be your fetish

  • After using bananas as a form of measurement, I don't think you need to clarify that you're from the USA.

    You guys have used football fields, washing machines, and bicycles as units of measurement haha

  • On the map it just crosses the red sea, how is this a continuous road?

    Who do they think can walk this, Moses?

  • I'm surprised Nixon gets: "being Richard Nixon" but Reagan doesn't get: "being the sack of shit that took the massive clear steps to destroy your country through corruption"

    How the fuck did they let Reaganomics slide?

  • I upvoted, but don't worry about karma on this site. It doesn't mean anything here, most people & apps don't care about some form of "total karma".

    All things considered it also didn't mean anything on Reddit, but people get a bit egotistical on there.

  • Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • So you're telling me that the US's purpose is, "Fuck bitches, get money"?

  • It is likely that articles on past social events or individuals will have some bias, as is the case with most articles on those matters.

    But, almost all articles on aspects of science are thoroughly peer reviewed and cited with sources. This alone makes Wikipedia invaluable as a source of knowledge.

  • Fair point.

    I don't browse Wikipedia much in languages other than English (mainly because those pages are the most up-to-date) but I can imagine there are some pages that straight up need to be in other languages. And given the smaller number of people reviewing edits in those languages, it can be manipulated to say what they want it to say.

    I do agree on the last point as well. The fact that literally anyone can edit Wikipedia takes a small portion of the bias element out of the equation, but it is very difficult to not have some form of bias in any reporting. I more use Wikipedia as a knowledge source on scientific aspects which are less likely to have bias in their reporting