An ethics professor at Cambridge talks about teaching ethics in 2025
SkyeStarfall @ SkyeStarfall @lemmy.blahaj.zone Posts 0Comments 1,560Joined 2 yr. ago
SkyeStarfall @ SkyeStarfall @lemmy.blahaj.zone
Posts
0
Comments
1,560
Joined
2 yr. ago
Deleted
Permanently Deleted
No, that is not the direct equivalence. The direct equivalence for 2. Would be something like
"But then they insist that being naked is never acceptable and is grotesque, and anyone that disagrees is a gross pervert"
That's where the inconsistency comes from