Skates @ Skates @feddit.nl

Posts

0

Comments

337

Joined

2 yr. ago

hitting someone entirely on accident shouldn't ruin two lives.

Why? Was the victim entirely innocent? Did it result in permanent injury or death of the victim(s)? Would it have been less dangerous if the one who produced the accident did not drive a car? Was the driver incapacitated by alcohol/drugs/anything else? If the answer to ANY of those is "yes", then it should very fucking well ruin two lives. And if the driver had a license, the entire system that granted them the responsibility of handling a few tons of metal should be considered accomplices until they can fucking prove otherwise.

Or at least have the decency to let the victim's family decide, don't take it upon yourself to just casually forgive a mistake if it had no impact on you.

Those are supposedly developing countries but they are doing a better job of controlling their tyrannical despots than we are.

That's... Really interesting tbh.

You're equating being a developed nation with the best thing ever, and expecting that if you're the most developed nation you are also the best at treating social issues, and are therefore a bit confused when you see how other less developed countries can treat these issues better.

But when we get right down to it, development has no real reason to also mean "just" or "lawful", right? I mean - "developed" means having a good economy, right? And when googling about it, the Human Development Index(HDI) comes up as well. But if we break it down, having money doesn't mean you're a better person. We can all think of countries with money but with a bad track record in human rights, like Saudi Arabia. And regarding the HDI, the US is 20th in that, right between South Korea (who are constantly faced with a nuclear threat along the border) and Israel (who are currently involved in stealing another countries' land and constantly persecuting that country's people). So what does developed mean in this context? Because it sure doesn't mean these countries should be able to sleep at night because they have no problems.

But skipping all that, what's weird to me is that this mentality of "we've got a lot of money therefore we have a great country and society and we only make good decisions" is so ingrained in you, that it actually surprises you when your country is surpassed by other countries in some aspects.

And it's nothing to do with you, sorry if I made it seem like I'm attacking you or something, because I'm really not. For lack of a better way to describe this, to someone from the outside it looks like you're a victim of a cult who is slowly starting to recognize that not everything the cult leader has been saying is actually true. I guess what I'm saying is - the American/capitalist propaganda machine does such a good job of pushing the "best country in the world" narrative, that it's really interesting to see the ramifications it has on people's way of thinking about the US.

Parents can make informed decisions based on pros and cons, or cost vs value. And they can teach their kid how to do it as well, so they have a skill for later in life when it'll be necessary.

Or they can buy the more expensive thing just so the kid shuts up, I guess that's also an option when parenting is too hard.

How the fuck did you manage to make fun about Americans not grasping that another language can exist, when this entire thread is about how Frenchies can't grasp that another language can exist.

Oh shit, well if you watched an Instagram reel then it's probably true.

Note though how I'm here reacting to something different with neither fear nor judgement, just with sarcasm.

I have another random thought: if his wife's father or brother or other similarly-inclined-for-justice sibling were given all the ammo and weapons, and they were both placed in a forest on an island, with the condition that only one can come out alive, and if it's this pig-looking motherfucker, then he gets skinned alive and then eaten by a hippo - how long could he put off the inevitable?

Then subsidize them for the recall, and take a percentage of their profits every year until it's paid back. How is it OK to pass on a manufacturer defect to all consumers?

I'm gonna guess at least a part of those games were pirated. I had the same issue when I used to pirate games, I was installing some shady shit and it would wreak chaos on my system so I had to reinstall windows every now and then. Since switching to steam I have not had to format once. Sailing the high seas sometimes gives you scurvy.

I'd say under 20%.

I play this game duo with a friend (where, like for d&d - it's hard to match schedules) and solo with 2 characters (and a third to follow after). I obviously like playing it with my friend, but tbh I think I like playing it solo just as much, or more. Both my solo campaigns and my duo one are pretty much in sync, but in my solo stuff I get to do what I want, with no consequences. Imagine if your d&d table is good-aligned, but after the session you get to go home and play the same session again, with your chaotic party, who doesn't take shit from town guards or uppity priests, who intimidates instead of persuading, who loots the dead king's body instead of saving him. So yeah, you can have both types of fun :)

Idk man, with some of the better ones you just feel the need to document them for posteriority.

2023-08-03, 8;04 GMT: Brrraaappppp - br - br - br - br - brapp - brap - BRAAAAAPPPPP (engine revving sounds)

Excerpt from my fart journal.

Ads and data gathering are really damn annoying. I'd like to purchase this software, but instead it's just a monthly subscription. I'm posting this from sync, but I gotta say - if there's no update removing this stuff, I'm switching back to jerboa.

I was prompted to consent to some stuff, which I unchecked. Then there was a "vendor preferences" button, where they were basically saying "ok, even if you don't consent, maybe you still wanna give them access if they have a legitimate interest". So since I have also a legitimate interest in not giving my data to shady fucking companies, I spent the next 10 minutes removing ticks from boxes basically, because fuck giving me a choice to "uncheck all", that would make it too easy to opt out.

Edit: and then to make it even more fun, I found a button somewhere in settings where I could remove my consent for gdpr-related reasons. So I clicked it. You wanna guess what it did? If you're guessing it removed my consent, sorry - it actually removed my "lack of consent" - that is to say, it reset the settings and prompted me to uncheck everything again. Cool beans.

Aside from this, I just spent 10 minutes removing consent for advertising/cookies/tracking/whatever for about 100 different vendors. I really hope I don't need to do that again, ever.

Add counters to progression:
20/180 quests completed
1805/9456 dialogue choices explored
567/568 npcs killed
95/102 areas explored
And whatever else you define as progress

Add this info into your save data. When quitting the game, open the most recent save, read the counters, compare to current values, display a nondescript "you've had a little/a lot of/no progress since you last saved, are you sure you want to quit without saving?" Shouldn't take so long that it triggers a lag spike, I don't think.

For my city, that would be the mayor - he's in charge of local police. He's being investigated for illegally giving away some land to some friends, who then kicked back some $$. These investigations usually end by reaching the statute of limitations, at which point everyone is outraged at how bad the justice system works for the rest of the day. And then they move on.

Under him would be the chief of police. He is being investigated for covering up sexual harassment in the police force, and for announcing the head of the local council that a search warrant will be executed at one of his illegal businesses.

The two adjuncts to the chief of police ride through the city in an Audi and a Porsche. They also have several houses each. They make 20000 Euro a year. Their wives are a teacher (small salary) and a doctor in a state hospital (so low pay as well). For reference, since you don't have the context of real estate prices - I make more than the adjuncts or their wives (on paper) and I'm not even close to being able to get enough money for a first apartment, let alone my 4th house. I must be a hater or something, cause for sure there's no corruption involved.

Sorry if it seems I have a vigilante justice boner. I'd be the first to enjoy a regular justice boner, if I had the luxury to be able to get one in these parts.

That's a great solution if it works. I was explaining this in another comment, but in my side of the world the police very rarely issue tickets for this type of stuff. And mostly when you call them they'll arrive in 30 min - 1 hour because it's "not a priority". Don't get me started on having something stolen (it never gets solved and they call you in a few months or years to retract your complaint because they can't solve it and it looks bad for them), or people being noisy at night or domestic violence complaints, where sometimes they'll ticket you for calling because you're "wasting their time" and "when they arrived there was no noise/sound of fighting/beating someone up". Like, of course dumbass. It happened 30 minutes ago. You think the lady spent 30 minutes arguing after the first punch? Of course they're quiet now.

And I'd understand their delay if they were actually busy with hard crime. But this is a small European country. We don't have guns. Out here a "gangster" will at most pull a knife on you, and then if they don't have another 3-4 guys with them they'll run with their tail between their legs if you pull a knife right back. This isn't a country of hardened criminals who grew up with the fear of bullets piercing the walls from gangs fighting on the block. Being police here is just being on a semi-vacation until 45, when you retire. They're doing fuck all, so when you ask them to actually do their job and not even prevent, but stop an ongoing crime - they would rather stop you from complaining instead.

Sorry, I went on a tangent there. TL;DR: my experience with police is that they're not helpful in these cases. I've learnt that the way you keep peace is by having superior firepower. Immediate physical violence or cost of fixing your vandalized asset are always better deterrents to being a prick than the potential outcome of maybe paying a few bucks, if some lazy assholes do their job, but probably walking away scot-free.

That's okay I usually hold the door open for people. Now get out.

It's easy to estimate the damage to their car. What's less easy to estimate is how damaging it is to slightly inconvenience everyone who walks by there.

I live in a country where everyone parks like there are no laws, because the police does nothing about it. There are traffic jams and accidents on a daily basis in a small (less than 20 million people) country, all because drivers don't give a shit if they're leaving the car in the first lane for 20 minutes while they're shopping, or that kids are walking through traffic because the sidewalk is considered free parking.

Yeah, I won't be inconvenienced too much by that guy's car, I'll just go around it. My neighbor in a wheelchair usually doesn't have that luxury, he needs to pretend he's a car for a few minutes and be in the first lane until the sidewalk is clear.

And no, an eye for an eye doesn't leave everyone blind. The only one left blind is the jerk who tries it on two different people.

I know we disagree on this and that's okay, I expect I'm on the wrong side of the fence on this one and I'm okay with it - different backgrounds & opinions & all that. I was just curious if you're arguing from a legal point of view or from a moral point of view. Have a good one :)

Hmm, I wonder:

• why is inconveniencing one person (admittedly on a worse level) worse than inconveniencing everyone that uses the sidewalk (so smaller level, but wider scale)?
• why do you believe this? Is it just because the law states one is punished worse than the other?

This is a fair decision for Turkey. You can't expect the owner to allow fags, it would bring in the entire country to compete with him in sucking some gay dick, and they just don't have enough seating for that.