SirDerpy @ SirDerpy @lemmy.world

Posts

1

Comments

590

Joined

1 yr. ago

I'm not sure of what to recommend as I'm not a fan. I've only seen a smattering of what was popular over the years. But, I also don't think it's difficult to recognize a strong vocalist or dancer. I admit she's not Whitney or MJ, that "incredible" was exaggeration of my perspective.

I'm also curious. I'd like to see what her fans consider her best.

Should we attempt to change that or upvote 600 times to propagate the nonsense?

I'm guessing it has more to do with who they endorse than their lack of political background.

That's because it's convenient and comfortable.

I don't care what people choose. I only care about the comprehensiveness and quality of their facts and reason.

You're asking more questions in this thread than anyone.

Isn't it meritable to ask questions?

I say it because it's the truth of your actions. It's an error you're now continuing to make.

That won't work out well for you, not even online. Best of luck.

I've done little more than ask questions about why someone should respect her political perspective because she's rich singer and dancer.

If the majority was logical then we'd have been revolting for the repeal of Glass-Steagall and the passing of the Interstate Branching and Banking Efficiency Act.

I think it's far more important to encourage wisdom than pretend to play whack-a-mole with bank-owned politicians.

What do you think?

Curious if anyone is fooled by such shallow ad hominem, Xen.

Is it wise to want others to choose based on propaganda instead of fact and reason?

She's an incredible singer and dancer. I've respect for her talent and hard work. If she ever decides to create content for adults and take some risks in composition then I'd probably even enjoy her music.

But, she's targeting adolescents and young adults. I agree that the majority are victims of propaganda and marketing.

This sub is propagating that nonsense. That's not good.

My point is that not everyone's opinion deserves respect.

For example, you've resorted to strawman instead of asking a question. It'll be quite difficult for me to respect anything else you've to say on the topic.

This story has nearly 600 upvotes, so far. Does that imply that we care about winning more than we care about the the wisdom and agency of others?

The stories from Kenosha and Racine are in a league of their own.

There's almost 600 upvotes so far. If this is propaganda then that fact speaks for itself.

Does the rich singer and dancer represent her values honestly, is it marketing, or is there some of both? Is it wise to assign her perspective value?

Why does anyone care what a singer and dancer thinks about political representation?

Is it wise that they assign her perspective value because they admire her ability to sing and dance?

Why do others assign value to her perspective? Is she especially qualified to decide whom others should vote for?

Why do they assign weight to her perspective?

Why do we care what a rich entertainer thinks?

By numbers, one third will advocate. One third will do nothing. One third will object. About ten percent will sacrifice to lead the rest. We could argue with history. But, that'd be dumb.