Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)SI
Posts
0
Comments
249
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • I was only on Arch for abit over a week just to “prove I could” but honestly didn’t see a huge upgrade over Endeavour for my personal use.

    Arch, Endeavour is one and the same. So of course you wouldn't see anything.

  • You were super unlucky then, had you installed Endeavor with the same settings, it could have crashed the exact same way.

    The difference between Archinstall installed Arch & EndeavorOS is very minimal and overrated. In this case I think the fix would have been picking the LTS kernel until 6.8 is released.

  • I get that, but if you want to play with new games, the latest mesa is what you want. sings BTRFS song for rollback

    For example even on ArchBTW I had to wait more than a month for a Mesa update to fix Alan Wake 2 for me.

  • I don't understand why would you want to use Arch for dev work and popos for gaming. Arch is not stable and will cause some issues every now and then and PopOS is worse for gaming, but is far more reliable on a production machine.

  • Mint is a huge community distribution and Nobara is one guy maintaining a gaming PC for himself and his father. He has done a lot of good for the community and is very smart, but I would never use his kernel, ever.

  • Fedora is a much better choice for a new user than Endeavor. (E is good, but it's very sink or swim, it's better to start with something else) So that's good. Don't know about the mod organizer, but I would be quite surprised if it didn't work, though using a windows program to navigate a Linux folder structure is something to get used to.( I played Starfield recently and installed mods manually )

    As for anticheat, yeah that's true. (Not that I would ever consider willingly installing spyware like that on my computer, nor are they very effective outside of stealing user data that is)

    As for Proton of course it works. Having a dedicated GPU will significantly increase compatibility, even if it's nvidia. Though if you want to source your games outside of Steam you really shouldn't bother with the Steam client, just use bottles.

  • The only benefit for a normal desktop user, who never plans to write code (or deploy stuff on multiple PCs) is that immutability makes updates far safer and easier.

    However this is the single largest weakness the Linux desktop has. Everyone can use a linux computer, maintenance though is always a problem. No one has succeeded at making a regular distribution that never needs command line intervention and a degree of knowhow to unbreak. (not counting Chrome OS) Maybe someday soon we'll have an immutable distribution that's truly just install and forget. (with good DE options like the new cosmic or even a carefully put together Hyprland rice)

  • This is not even close to the worst thing they have ever done, but stuff like this is a waste of resources. People mostly want official vertical tabs and more than anything engine performance improvements. (and the ability to pretend to be Chrome in Youtube)

  • I tried many times, though not recently and I agree with it being worse than just redundant. Sure, it's usable and maintainable, but it's objectively a bad idea.

    You can just run vanilla arch, or one of the installers like Endeavor OS and just use BTRFS snapshots to counter breakages instead of Manjaro's delay thing managed by people I just cannot take very seriously.

  • There is a shill on YT called Linuxcast. (I like his content, but he is defo a Suse shill) Personally i'd rather fix some arch fuckups, then to not have the AUR. (or if I don't have the AUR, then just use Debian)