Crazy how they say that they developed one toy "after learning that many women’s first sexual experience involved water."
Like, how is there no research about this that you can just look up and then design products accordingly? Seems like sexology is a totally underexplored field of research.
Somehow meta is only in the press for its mistakes. Are they just not doing anything well, except for keeping Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp running?
I stopped reading after the first example. One of them is described as "good" and the other as "bad". The bad one though does not actually fix the errors in the good one, but just leaves them out. The good one seems to be only an introduction. The bad one seems to be trying to convey content. Surely not very well, but comparing an introduction with content is like comparing apples with pears.
Don't need firefighters if fires are banned