ShiverMeTimbers @ ShiverMeTimbers @lemm.ee

Posts

53

Comments

96

Joined

10 mo. ago

Bahais have the syncretism built in though. If you were to ask one "what else are you", they'd say "I'm just a Baha'i, I can't be anything else."

A lot of Christians are Pagan. They either found a way to incorporate Pagan gods as angels or change the semantics up a little. This was common among the Irish, and the Aztecs actually ended up seeing the Christian god and saying "hey it's one of our own" rather than the Christians modifying the Aztec beliefs.

Some Christians are Buddhist, either because they are Catholic and believe the Buddha was canonized under a slightly altered narrative or because they found an interpretation of the Buddhist teachings that don't conflict with Christian ideas.

Also, some interpretations of Judaism are atheistic. Some readings of Genesis omit the interpretation that he made the universe, just the Earth (which a lot of Mormons use to claim God comes from a lineage of gods, something that oddly feels more satisfying than the traditional Christian view).

That sounds more like faith-fluid. That's rather common, a lot of people have a few things they are fickle over. Like how Ned Flanders is a Christian but keeps kosher "just in case".

I am atheistic as there is no proof but often think to myself "but then again, God could technically be true if the right modifications are made, and then I must wonder if it's better to thank something that's not there than to end up dismissing something that is".

Then you admit the accusations of her being an art thief are just speculation?

It's not, she's just using the wording as a joke. In my country, the word "steamy" isn't even NSFW, it just denotes steam.

Sure, just as long as I get to accuse you of false accusations of art theft, based on those screenshots (which further prove you just came here to slander the poor girl). Those images you accuse her of stealing were traded to her via art trade, she went into detail about that some time ago.

I did.

The first one is admittedly vague. She says it's a reference to the steamed hams meme. She was inviting him over to an unforgettable luncheon.

The second one I don't know. She might not understand shipping. Mike and Brian didn't.

Because they're deleted, duh.

Edited, no. Out of context, yes.

Textually legitimate, contextually legitimate, or subtextually legitimate?

These are all different. Plus you actually have to prove their ages and their local legal ages for it to even begin to be legally binding.

How am I slandering by posting the screenshots

I answered this question. You then edited it to include another one.

The person above Triagonal asks for NSFW material. It's straight up dark web material. Triagonal simply asks for a story about a day out.

This is how the two of you sound right now.

Unedited does not mean contextually accurate.

Three reasons for that.

1. Slander under law does not require it to be a lie.
2. It is a lie. The context is different in both instances. Anyone who sees the whole thread knows.
3. The channel you link to is known for being transphobic and not caring as long as it calls out people it doesn't like as pedos, because that's what it is, a slander channel.

I've been in tune to this for a while.

Funny you mention legality. The person the OP is slandering (as in it's not true enough to be considerable), was actually taken to court and acquitted in all instances, because the people trying to target her with slander fall apart under due process. She wasn't depicting anything NSFW about minors, she just used wording that missed a beat.

TL;DR Yes, there are absolutely other ways to view this, especially when you did not question the defense. Gullible lemmings, I see why this place is Communist now.

The OP is lying about several things and taking other things out of context, which was their whole point in coming to Lemmy and ban evading twice when they got caught the first two times.

The OP is lying about several things and taking other things out of context, which was their whole point in coming to Lemmy and ban evading twice when they got caught the first two times.