12 years have already passed, so 50% is already gone.
How much is enough? 1% of a large concentration is quite different than 50% of a small concentration. Shouldn’t we compare this in units of concentration instead of vaguely defined percentages?
Also, why are we focusing on the tritium? Are you confident that everything else is filtered so we don’t have to worry about the rest?
Tritium has a half-life of only 12 years. In 80 years, 99% of it is gone.
I would be more concerned that the filtration system wasn’t sufficient enough to remove more dangerous radioactive contaminants. I believe that’s what the countries around who are opposed or skeptical are concerned about.
“With a few such pencil strokes — and eraser rubbings — Wisconcom had turned the mighty Prigozhin into an invincible shield of anti-revisionism and his plane crash into a mere suggestion.”
A lot of OP’s pasta is Chinese first and identical English second, but there are clear departures from this, such as the initial “动态网自由门 天安門 天安门 法輪功 李洪志 Free Tibet”
Note that Tibet does not occur in the Chinese there at all.
The International Atomic Energy Agency says it’s within safe limits, but I do agree that monetary reasons seem to make this release questionable.