Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)SH
Posts
3
Comments
1,535
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • The 2nd amendment never once mentions private gun ownership, so it seems more like the right to bear arms was always intended to be a right of the individual states, not a right of private citizens.

    My take is that it was to enable the militia, especially minutemen, to, as the text says, "keep and bear arms" in their homes and not during actual battles.

  • Spoiler, it's not going to change anything. People can still stockpile their rations and get trashed, or get other people, who aren't going to use their rations, to buy for them. And 18 beers, three bottles of wine, or a bottle of liquor is still enough to get trashed on in a night.

    And that doesn't even touch the sexual assaults where alcohol isn't involved.

  • this Court should order the return of the seized property to a person designated by Rex Heuermann, individual or licensed gun dealer, who may legally possess the items

    Not him personally. Seems fair. Cops keep stuff in evidence far too long. Especially in the case of valuables, they'll often send them to auction, or "auction" where their buddies get to "buy" them for cheap. And even if they return them to the owner, they've often been kept in shitty conditions, becoming moldy or rusty or whatever.

  • Yeah. Exchange in 365 is, in almost every scenario, the far better option than running it on-prem. No more worries about installing the latest CU before attackers get in.

    The only scenario where on-prem makes sense is a totally offline environment.

  • That's not at all feasible for places with long, cold winters, or southwest areas without enough water, among others.

    And before you say "well people shouldn't live there then", they live in those places because of the other resources. For example, let's say logging in Montana, or oil fields in Texas. You're not going to get the world to stop needing those resources any time soon.

  • This is most likely caused by changes in ocean temperatures. Those changes are part of climate change.

    Global weather is an extremely complex system. Any change will have knock-on effects on the rest of the system. If the changes are big enough, you start seeing big effects like this.

    I'm not sure what your example is meant to show. An ocean-scale current isn't something you can walk up to and mess with. But burning forests is certainly a contributor to climate change, which would be one of the causative factors in ocean warming and currents changing.