Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)SH
Posts
3
Comments
1,535
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Outside of this (and the utility fucking up, sending too much pressure, and blowing up a bunch of houses) they're perfectly safe. Millions of homes around the world have gas service and incidents are very rare.

    But given the health implications of just normal operation, I'm still not going to get a gas stove in the future.

  • Bad headline. The text says "would consider", which is significantly different.

    Furthermore, they don't identify the study at all, so I can't even go look at it. I don't see one on S&P Global Mobility's site that looks like the right one.

  • Maybe. If both parties agreed to the change to become remote full time, then they'd both have to agree to change back. Though having a previous non-remote work agreement changed by an international state of emergency does give some weight to the employer side.

    But I'm not a lawyer.