Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)IS
I'll be on ShareMySims@lemmy.dbzer0.com @ ShareMySims @sh.itjust.works
Posts
31
Comments
659
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • I'm in the UK, we have the NHS, and several "sin taxes", and they still pretty much exclusively penalise the poor (as does the NHS which has been defunded to oblivion in favour of rampant privatisation, so those who can't afford to go private are left with the ruins), while those selling the "sinful" products (and private health insurance) continue to rake it in.

    There is no taxing or legislating or regulating our way our of capitalism, which is exclusively responsible for those in power exchanging the health and well being of the population and the planet for profit, and they will never allow any tax or legislation or regulation to pass that would put them at any kind of disadvantage. The fact that some people still think they would, is frankly quite terrifying.

  • He also wouldn't have made it to this point alive were he Black, nor would he have the same kind of support had he previously spoken out about Black liberation or the Land Back movement for example, rather than how "wokeism" is the cause of racism.

    I've said it before and I'll say it again - him shooting a CEO was good and inspiring, putting anyone up on a pedestal, starting a cult of personality, and ignoring some or all of the different systems of oppression at play, is definitely not.

  • oh man

    Jump
  • Was killing a murderous CEO a good and inspiring thing to do, and do we need to see more of that kind of direct action? Abso-fucking-lutely.

    Is putting anyone, however much you might admire an action/s they took, up on a pedestal, ever a constructive thing to do? No.

    Is spouting bigotry ever acceptable? Never.

    And the only thing overlooking and brushing off bigotry achieves is more bigotry, and sending the message to the marginalised people around you that you care more about venerating a stranger who causes them harm but made you feel warm and fuzzy for a minute, than you do about ending their oppression.

    This is why "no war but the class war" fails every time - intersectionality is essential, and if you don't use your privilege to prioritise protecting those who are more marginalised than you, even from supposed allies (which a frankly terrifying number of people seem entirely reluctant to do) - then what the fuck are you doing? (enabling and participating in bigotry is what)

    If you can't deal with valid criticism of someone you consider a hero, you're not a fan, you're a cult follower, and nothing good has ever come from being part of a cult.

    E: Just adding what I've seen so far, if your knee jerk reaction is to defend these posts, or brush them off as "error in judgment" or whatever (especially if you would be outraged if, say, some random MAGA had made similar statements, as I'm sure many have), you are saying that their content, and the people it is aimed at, are acceptable collateral damage to you.

  • rule

    Jump
  • I'm honestly not sure what the point of your story is, if anything, it was a surprisingly good result that the teacher was removed and the child wasn't abused any further, and quite gross that the protest was against this happening. Sounds like you agree with the protestors and were not happy with that result and think the child should have been subjected to even more scrutiny? Which is an odd point to try and make around a group of autistic people talking about being abused by schools and other institutions.

    Literally last month an autistic kid was arrested and suspended for a "bomb threat" AFTER all they found his bag was a stuffed toy.

    Also

    a otherly-able (I hope this is a okay descriptor)

    No, it's not ok. Disabled is the word you are looking for.

  • The whole entire thing.

    Competition is unnecessary.

    Humans are not in a battle for survival, there is enough for everyone.

    It is artificial bullshit created and enforced by capitalists to make them as much money and power as possible.

    Competition, by definition creates and breeds and encourages inequality and oppression of others.

    There is no good reason to cling on to it, never mind try to base a plan for a better society on it

  • Extreme wealth disparity is not due to a lack of taxes, but rather a lack of competition.

    No.

    No no no.

    This isn't personal (assuming you wrote this, you mention your site, so I'm assuming) but I'm just so sick and fucking tired of people thinking they've seriously analysed the state of affairs of the world, but not only refuse to even name capitalism, let alone point to it as the core problem, but worse, insist on the nonsensical idea that we can and should fix things from within it and under its rules (and in your example, using one of its most toxic and destructive elements), instead of realising the only way to free ourselves is to abolish it entirely, as if capitalism is some sort of natural order we simply can't exist outside of.

    I don't know if you meant it to, but your analysis gives "an"cp vibes in how close it gets to getting it, and then how fast and how far it eventually veers off course.

    Whatever the case. I think you're close enough to benefit from exploring further if you think you can set your biases aside and sit with the discomfort of unlearning the constructs you've been made to believe are natural and unavoidable, otherwise you're just going to keep skirting the issue but never hitting the point.

  • rule

    Jump
  • Unfortunately autistic kids still today, because knowing that autism exists and is much more common than previously realised hasn't really stopped anyone, but rather just gives ableists more opportunities to express their ableism.

  • Fair enough, I get your point that there is a philosophical question with no consensus on an answer in the kind of example you gave (potentially, unknowingly, unintentionally causing harm to a single individual at some hypothetical point in the future), and that there are interesting discussions to be had about those kinds of situations, but I still maintain that the example bares no relevance to the situation we're discussing here (deliberately, certainly, directly and immediately causing the deaths and suffering of countless people), because as you say yourself, it's quite easy to make the direct link from CEO to deaths.

  • My understanding is by medical standards, the evidence is pretty low quality,

    Your understanding is wrong and influenced by transphobic rhetoric, not "medical standards", which have considered puberty blockers safe and effective since at least the 1980s.

    The use of puberty blockers is supported by twelve major American medical associations, including the American Medical Association,[14] the American Psychological Association,[15] and the American Academy of Pediatrics.[16] the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry,[17] the Pediatric Endocrine Society,[18] the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists,[19] the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists,[20] and the American College of Physicians.[21] In Australia four medical organizations support them,[22] as does the Endocrine Society,[23] and the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH).[24]

    Overall, puberty blockers have demonstrated an excellent safety and efficacy profile in the treatment of precocious puberty. The most common side effects reported include nonspecific headaches, hot flashes, and implant-related skin reactions.[39]

    source

    E: and before you try throwing bone density at me, most of the people impacted are cis (and will not be stopped from taking blockers), and either way, there is simple treatment to counteract this minor issue (and which is completely insignificant when compered to the alternative). The ban is 100% motivated by transphobia and cruelty.

  • 196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    Remember your rules

    196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    Rule

    196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    Rule-otov 🐸🔥

    196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    Rule

    196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    Costume rule

    196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    Ruleflakes

    196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    Rulebow

    196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    Hungrule hungrule Moo Deng

    196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    Wonderule

    Privacy @lemmy.ml

    Labour adopts hated Tory bank surveillance and DWP search and seize powers

    196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    Terrulerism