It's where you put the shit posts
Shardikprime @ Shardikprime @lemmy.world Posts 137Comments 2,365Joined 2 yr. ago
Shardikprime @ Shardikprime @lemmy.world
Posts
137
Comments
2,365
Joined
2 yr. ago
I can only say that once I started studying physics, QM seemed crazy too. I won't even go into the astrophysics patchwork that is the ∆CDM models, that's bonkers. Even the CMBR looks like it's assuming a lot of things to me, and lately it's been taking a beating with new findings.
There is bunch of things people say or do that are crazy or astonishing for you without context. Id suggest you to try not dismissing those things with a thought if you really want to understand them.
The claim of no factual evidence begs the question of what is factual evidence for the reader. Also self explanatory within the context of the book we are discussing.
As for the question of knowing what God thinks or wants, it's self explanatory, given that we are dealing in a discussion within the context of a book that, presumably, tries to explain that to readers.
Beyond the advice, you are obviously allowed to think anything about anyone.
It's a sacrifice of a perfect (never sinned) life for born and unborn innumerable sinner lives. The sin here is a categorical definition of not being perfect in god's eyes.
Basically if you were perfect in god's eyes, every decision, and action, conscious or not, would follow God's will. Being a sinner just means that, again, in the eyes of God, your every action does not follow God's will
Here is the logic behind it
An imperfect being life, untold quintillions of them, cannot ever weight the same vs a perfect one in god's eyes.
The original templates for Human beings, made perfect, willingly sinned , and therefore, made sinners of anyone born of them
The crux of this issue is very deep, but basically, God's whole sovereignty over his creation were being put to test by an opposing force (Satan) which basically tricked humans to create a situation that enabled the questioning of God legal framework for the then existing humanity and proposing that humans could, in actual fact, self govern and make perfect decisions with their lives without God's intervention.
The very nature of the questioning line implies that had God cleaned the slate clean, deleting everything as a bad game of Sims, his very nature would have been made obsolete. So this was a non choice in god's eyes
It also implied that, without sufficient time, imperfect beings would never be able to self organize to discover a way to self govern without God's intervention.
The third implication was that it was unfair for God to punish innumerable unborn generations for the mistake made by their originating template.
A plan was made by God himself to solve this, the bible calls this a prophecy, in which a perfect life was to be the sacrifice for the born and unborn innumerable sinners which were thrown into that situation (understandable, how can an unborn person have done anything to be a sinner) without being directly responsible for it.
Jesus life, born under the protection of god's shadow, being born. perfect (again never sinned) more than matches against the weight of any number of imperfect lives.
That's why the bible calls his sacrifice a "once and for all" kind of deal. It basically applies against 99.99% of anything a human can do consciously or not to sin.
Unasked
Undeserved
Unlimited forgiveness.
I can explain more but that's basically the gist of it
All cool but the dude's name was Pontius Pilate (Poncio Pilato)
Many Christian, but non Catholic denominations definitely do not use, or phased out the usage, of crosses ( also fish symbols/religious stamps/rosaries and so on) as they understand this fact
Also they understand that Matthew 16:24 is referring to a Stavros/stauros, literally a wooden torture stake/pole, in allegory to taking a heavy responsibility, in general, as previous context shows that spreading the lord's message, with the difficulties it may bring, to extract a heavy toll on the average person's life, up to the point of having to sacrifice said life
They also understand that even thought the old law have been abolished, the spirit of it keeps on on many of their aspects, so no worshipping idols of any kind (imaginary or physical) is seen as the practical approach
The swallow may fly south with the sun or the house martin or the plumber may seek warmer climes in winter yet these are not strangers to our land
Indeed. One has to understand that the people calling for violence in these threads usually never get to the stage of wondering what happens when their circular reasoning is used against them
Fascinating
That's the greatest justification the government needed, do not complain when it is used against you
What would be the issue with that.
What justified this instance of your violence vs one instance of their violence?
Dehumanizing a fictional enemy lets collectivists and terrorist supporters feel like they are in a real war without being in one and also let's them balance the cognitive dissonance of a discourse that claims to accept others while in practice they just want to get rid of others
It's fascinating, actually
Man i loved the middle.
It was extremely relatable
It reminded me a bit of surviving Jack, fortunately this one did lock more than one season
LMAO we are at the point that social security systems (bigger ponzi scheme ever) all over the world are at the verge of collapse due to the stress of an aging population, and this dude not only thinks they will be able to have kids and send them to something resembling a school by 2040, but also worrying about a potential AI future where they will more likely not be a part of given the 3 years takeoff curve.
I have no mouth and I must KEK
You can just say AGI, GAI sounds super mega gay
The morning’s heeeeere!
Man I love that guy!
He was one of the highlights of the show for me
Fuck no
I need traceable communications
Send me an email, I don't want to discuss potentially non contract and policy approved things over a medium that won't record it
People, keep your communications traceable at all times
That explains why Kamala lost.
This is gold, Jerry. GOLD
One drive is really cheaper than Google one in many countries.
Also don't complain about having off-site backups, you will cry when you need them.
And certainly having one drive is better for your average non backup architecture oriented user than having no backup or worst, setting it up themselves to later find they never did it correctly
Teams use case works 95% of the time. That's honestly impressive. Yeah sure, it might act wonky sometimes but what software doesn't.
In general is a good tool for calls meetings and general notes