Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)SH
Posts
0
Comments
250
Joined
5 mo. ago

  • So I re-state the same n-th time over: I, and many other devs, have no need to draw anything. So I, and many other devs, will choose whatever works for us, and there is exactly nothing wild in doing so

  • It’s wild to me that people that people use VIM in professional software development settings

    Ya, sure. wild that professional software development does not begin and end with 3d shapes. Great worldvew, thanks

    • that is not VSCode default, so nah. once again: I have no time for battling against software
    • and if I do not want the GUI part, how come it surprises you that I do not use that superset?
  • You have overdone the pedantic part, so I will do the same: GUI has objectively way more visual noise, so exactly in professional software development setting I prefer using NeoVim with plugins, configured by me for my convenience, because I have no intention of spending any extra effort, and more importantly, thought, on whatever the IDE decided I must need. I want to think about the task at hand, not memorize the finger-twisting magical shortcuts or mouse-clicking several menu layers to do one damn simple thing

  • A-ha, better languages my ass. They may make some specific job easier, but calling them good just because of that - nuh-uh. I would (and actually will) rather spend time learning to properly use C or C++

  • I would say "why not, to each their own" if not the thought about what else the filemanager is going to do with root access (like downloading data from web for file preview). But the general sentiment still stands, it is absurd to think that computer must be used only in one way by all people

  • I'll bait. Let's think:

    -there are three humans who are 98% right about what they say, and where they know they might be wrong, they indicate it

    • now there is an llm (fuck capitalization, I hate the ways they are shoved everywhere that much) trained on their output
    • now llm is asked about the topic and computes the answer string

    By definition that answer string can contain all the probably-wrong things without proper indicators ("might", "under such and such circumstances" etc)

    If you want to say 40% wrong llm means 40% wrong sources, prove me wrong