Sentrovasi @ Sentrovasi @kbin.social

Posts

0

Comments

129

Joined

2 yr. ago

Yeah these posts by people who consistently get banned always have me feeling a little skeptical (no shade on OP if legit).

Unsounded by Ashley Cope is one I love that hasn't been mentioned yet.

They said they spent another hour after launching, though - not sure you can launch without having interacted with the Nomai statue.

Vaping is banned in Singapore. You still see some people illegally possessing and vaping though.

And I venture to argue that because of the way politicians want to maintain their voterbases, it pushes his politics further and further into fascism.

I think the criticism is that they're repeatedly publishing these and claiming they're outliers without attempting to show how they got their results, from what I'm reading.

I really hate his justification because it seems incredibly selfish and short-sighted. Imagine if he murdered someone and said it wasn't murder because it was art. It can be both, and society might also argue it is not art or should not normatively be art.

That was the prop money. I guess if they'd known he'd steal it, they would've used fake prop money instead.

I think the problem is this: the man was paid for his work. People don't seem to get that.

The deal was that he was paid an amount of money to make an art piece. That art piece was supposed to use another bunch of money as props. He was supposed to then give back the prop money after the exhibition was over.

When he made his work that used none of the money, that was fine. The museum rolled with it and gave him his dues. They didn't even ask for the prop money back when they realised he wasn't using it.

The problem is that he's now supposed to return the prop money that was to be used in the artwork, and he's refusing to.

He's already been paid, he's just being a shit to an organisation offering a public service.

It's a burn and also true. If a genetic mutation becomes prevalent enough, it's no longer really considered to be a "mutation".

Serious question: If you're not expecting a response, why put it on social media? It might be healthier to externalise some of your rants through other means and move away from the expectation that things need to be on social media for them to matter.

Never ask it for advice period. It is always confident because that's the most believable way to present information on the internet. It is usually wrong because it is not actually intelligent.

The part about sheriffs scares me as someone not well-versed in American affairs because I read previously that some sheriffs don't believe that federal laws should apply to them and that could be good, I guess? But could also be really bad.

Hag's Bane finally working right after I gave up on trying to use it! I don't really mind though, and am glad at least to know now that it really was a bug.

Can't they do both? Do they still need to kill all the people on the tracks? That part of the argument isn't coherent.

I think the point they are trying to make is that in this situation, the perpetrator would have said she tripped and stabbed her with a knife if she didn't have access to a gun. It's not a gun issue, this person just genuinely wanted to murder a child that got on her nerves.

It is actually safe, though, and all this fear-mongering based on misinformation rather than what actually has been said by not just Japan but the IAEA (and admitted by SK) is really hindering efforts at sustainable energy.

I haven't watched it, but Ado's songs are amazing and are a huge pull factor for me.

I've literally never heard about it until this post.

Looking at the reviews seems like a shame as the only complaints are the hardware limitations. Still won't be getting it until I finish (at least some of) my backlog.

I genuinely had students believe that what ChatGPT was feeding them was fact and try to source it in a paper. I stamped out that notion as quick as I could.