Me too. We have plenty of bones of people who lived into old age with signs of disability or having been crippled.
But the overall stats not only do I not know, but since we only have a relatively minor number of data points it's hard to really say any of us will ever know.
What we have does tend to point to being better than a medieval city iirc, and I think the general consensus amongst anthropologists is that the transition to agriculture saw a decrease in life expectancy.
Gavrillo Princip and Lee Harvey Oswald show it's hardly new.
Both bullied outsiders who wanted to show the world they weren't weak and could leave a mark on history.
Edit: your overall point about the constraints on masculinity though is very much on the mark I think, though. All the more reason to break down gender norms.
Cleaving to the centre has enabled Trump, because centrists can't criticise the neoliberal system while Trump and his MAGA cult can and will.
As the facade of neoliberal policy crumbles we can all see it doesn't work. Being able to criticise it and assert a different future (rather than a mythical past of greatness) is essential.
My favourite part of Scrabble rules as written is that if another player challenges the existence of a played word the player who is wrong skips their turn, be they challengee or challenger.
The spelling differences are actually mostly due to Noah Webster standardising what he saw as pure Anglo-Saxon English without corruption by French princelings.
OP is arguing that there are many ways of communicating in a language, including slang and various registers and dialects, and just because you and I don't understand all of them that's OK. They're still valid communication and not the same as stunted linguistic or communicative ability as the ability to communicate between people familiar with the slang or dialect is not stunted at all.
Addresses is the main one.
But also when talking about objects and categories, e.g. "the oak is a type of tree", not "trees have a type which is oak".