Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)SE
Posts
4
Comments
519
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • Yeah, it's like giving anyone who's living somewhere illegally no due process. If they can deport people based on what they say is illegal and you have no way to fight that, then who's to say that they aren't going to call you illegal and deport you?

  • I think that a lot of the "laziness" comes from alienation from your labour. People are going to work the least amount to get their paycheck and if their job doesn't account for the effort they put in, they aren't going to do anything but the bare minimum.

  • the things you listed are most certainly not a requirement.

    Then what are? Why wouldn't the ability to maintain/repair, modify or resell be requirements for ownership?

    If "ownership" doesn't have a unified meaning, then I can interpret "ownership" as the ability to maintain/repair, modify or resell the bought item.

  • You were arguing that having control over something (as in "being able to maintain/repair, modify or even resell" it) isn't a requirement for the thing's ownership?

    Then what does "ownership" entail? Being allowed to use the thing but not modify or repair it? I'd argue that this isn't what "ownership" means.