Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)SG
Seasoned_Greetings @ Seasoned_Greetings @lemm.ee
Posts
0
Comments
583
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Here's the difference. When we talk about companies dominating an industry, we're usually talking about practices that keep competition from even forming. Monopolies are formed as a result of big companies buying out or making it impossible for their competition.

    Steam doesn't do that, which is a big reason they won their monopoly suit. They just provide a better model than anyone else is willing to, and they rake in the cash because of it.

    Compare this situation to books-a-million in the states. Books-a-million doesn't have a monopoly on books, they just have created a better environment for selling them. They aren't stopping other book stores from opening or buying chains to shut them down, they just sell you a cup of coffee and give you a place to sit while you browse their massive selection.

    That's not a monopoly, that's just better business.

  • I'll never understand why some people look at the fact that steam is popular because of their policies, and can't help but make a comment like this equating that popularity to cock worship.

    Like, we get it bro. You're thinking about cocks and you're mad about a half decent game store. What compelled you to combine those thoughts on a public forum?

    The weird thing is that this isn't even the first comment I've seen like this. Dudes that are mad about steam want everyone else to know about steam's massive, throbbing cock for some reason. This guy alone has posted 3 of these.

  • I'll never understand why some people look at the fact that steam is popular because of their policies, and can't help but make a comment like this equating that popularity to cock worship.

    Like, we get it bro. You're thinking about cocks and you're mad about a half decent game store. What compelled you to combine those thoughts on a public forum?

    The weird thing is that this isn't even the first comment I've seen like this. Dudes that are mad about steam want everyone else to know about steam's massive, throbbing cock for some reason. This guy alone has posted 3 of these.

  • I'll never understand why some people look at the fact that steam is popular because of their policies, and can't help but make a comment like this equating that popularity to cock worship.

    Like, we get it bro. You're thinking about cocks and you're mad about a half decent game store. What compelled you to combine those thoughts on a public forum?

    The weird thing is that this isn't even the first comment I've seen like this. Dudes that are mad about steam want everyone else to know about steam's massive, throbbing cock for some reason. This guy alone has posted 3 of these.

  • Hot take: I'm playing unicorn overlord and started it after I read this article a couple days ago. It's honestly not that bad.

    The story itself feels a little shallow, being about 10 hours in. Aside from a certain character being "abducted", I really haven't perceived any risk so far. It seems like every decision I make is a no-brainer with consequences only appearing if I make the obtusely obvious wrong decision.

    Story and writing wise, it isn't really the shining example of jrpgs to begin with, so the localisation just seems like a footnote so far.

    The gameplay loop is pretty satisfying though, which is why I'm still in it. I'm ready for the writing to mature into a darker game and hoping that this first "chapter" is just a light beginning. But I wouldn't be surprised if it didn't happen.

    To be honest, if I were going to be offended at anything in this game, it'd be the jiggly boobs on half the girl units for no reason and the overtly sexual way that the witch class character just... Stands there swinging her hips? But I'm not one to even care that much about eye candy. But it'd make a better complaint to me than overly-shakepearean localisation.

  • While I agree with you that the teacher in this post is wrong about what this is, I don't think labeling "gender bigotry" indiscriminately as something both sexes do under one umbrella is accomplishing anything but minimizing the struggle women have endured for basically all of human existence up until the last few decades.

    Personally, I wouldn't fault this woman for thinking what she does if she's willing to accept a broader explanation later, given that women have literally been sold as property up until a couple hundred years ago.

    Women have the right to at least posit the ways they as a group have been held down, and that includes accepting their indignation and allowing them grace for when they're wrong, because without those things they won't actually learn the truth.

    Further than that, I think it's necessary for women learning now to have the same realization this one did that women throughout all of history save for this recent tiny sliver have been oppressed. Even if it's built on an incidentally faulty premise, that doesn't mean the realization itself is wrong.

    Covering up the discourse by labeling the process of realization as "gender bigotry" is itself an attempt at erasure, and very much puts you on the side of the oppressors, just because you think it's distasteful to have this realization yourself.

    I'm sure gender bigotry exists in the direction of women towards men. This ain't it.

  • I work in maritime, often alongside Indian counterparts who speak both English to me and Indian to their ship mates.

    Yes, they do speak Indian just as fast. Yes, the way they speak English has a lot to do with the cadence of how they speak their native language.

    As far as the flow goes, I've noticed that Indian does flow better than English just listening to it, but I don't know enough of it to make that observation with any credibility.

  • From my understanding, it's just one guy who bought the whole thing and believes that anything cartoon/comic related isn't relevant anymore. He's trying to move wb into the "reality tv" era.

    All of which is really stupid because wb is literally only known for its century-long run of pretty good cartoons and comics, and its reality aspect was so bad that they had to brand it off of wb, which is what the cw is.

    So yeah, this one guy is running wb into the ground and destroying one of the biggest animated repositories on the planet because he "doesn't like cartoons".

  • Out of these, unfortunately the only one that even has a chance of being realized is "IRS does taxes for everyone", and even that is more like "IRS provides official avenue to not have to pay a tax prep service"

    The rest of these won't happen without a revolution, because the people with the power to make these things happen all directly benefit from them.

    Don't get me wrong, I'd love to see even one or two things on this list become reality. Any two would make a ton of difference for a lot of people. But capitalism doesn't like it when you benefit the average Joe, and capitalism always wins here.

  • I've heard that if you want a dumb TV, you buy a smart TV with input priority on the hdmi and never connect to the internet.

    How accurate is that?

    I wouldn't know, as I've been blessed with a couple of dumb tvs from the golden age of dumb tvs for the last 10 years.