Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)SG
Seasoned_Greetings @ Seasoned_Greetings @lemm.ee
Posts
0
Comments
583
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • It's not contagious like a disease. It's more like a sticky, oily slime you can just wipe off later. It's unpleasant but reality will be there to clean you off.

    That's the thing though. The human garbage that wallows in it daily actually likes the slime. They bathe in it and smell like it, but they can stop whenever they want and come back to the real world.

    They choose not to.

  • Don't starve and Kitchen nightmares

    What the everloving fuck is this? It tastes like you cooked monster meat in a crockpot

    You're going to kill someone with this dish you fucking donkey

    Wes frantically making balloon animals

  • Btw, I still won't reply and can't see yours, but I just wanted you to know I think it's cute that you're compulsively down voting my comments. It's the sign of someone with no other recourse lol

  • What I've read so far about each of those cases is that nato was deployed to either halt a genocide or suppress a terrorist organization. Both of those things are still defensive actions.

    Though I guess they could be interpreted as aggressive by countries that are pro-genocide and pro-terrorism, so it makes perfect sense that a Russia/China instance would be pissing themselves.

    Your fears are based in the aggressive nature of the countries you simp for, so do carry on. Nothing I say is going to convince you one way or the other if you're already eating the propaganda cereal.

  • Are you saying you can't? Are you maybe saying that the only sources you have are Russian propaganda? Or are you just being condescending because you can get away with it on a Russian sympathizing instance?

  • Jsyk. You don't kill the cat because it has fleas. Unless you were looking for a reason to kill the cat in the first place.

    Caring about the cat doesn't equate to defending the fleas unless your goal is to get rid of the cat.

    I know this doesn't matter to you, because you've already attached your identity to the Russian genocide justification. But someone has to advocate for the other 44.995 million of them. It's clear you'd rather them dead.

    Anyway, enjoy being blocked. I have no more time to give to a genocide sympathizer.

  • No, I didn't. But you don't want to hear that because the only way your bloody justification works is if everyone is a nazi sympathizer.

    Keep your fingers in your ears. You are insignificant

  • Ah yes, the sign of an intellectual: ignore points you don't agree with and call the other person a nazi.

    The numbers are there. You are a Russian apologist content with seeing 45 million people lose their homes because of 2,500 shit bags.

    Enjoy siding with the war criminals.

  • There are plenty of neonazis on our police force.

    Azov has 900-2500 total members and are recognized as local militia only. In no way is supplying Ukraine's military equivalent to "giving Azov weapons" unless you explicitly want a reason to justify killing Ukrainians.

    Want to guess how many police officers we have nation wide here? Or maybe you have another whataboutism for me?

  • Russian propaganda painting Azov as all 45 million people in Ukraine when in reality they represent a percent of a percent.

    It's like saying we should invade the US because some of them are self professed neonazis. Absolutely bonkers unless you wanted to fabricate a reason to invade in the first place

  • NATO is a defense agreement. I know I'm on a Russian-apologist instance, but you guys are huffing Russian glue every time you parrot the propaganda of NATO being a threat to Russia.

    By definition, NATO is only a threat to Russia if Russia threatens to expand, full stop.

  • I'm no expert, but I always thought the American brand "conservative" stood for "fiscal conservative", as in, to save money by limiting government spending.

    That definition lines up well with their actual policies which tend to be cutting government spending, tax cuts, downsizing government jobs, etc.

    Not really conserving traditions. Although there's plenty of that in their cultural identity.

    Edit: to be clear, the party has long since moved past being actually conservative. The most accurate description they might have now would be the party of spite.