Scipitie @ Scipitie @lemmy.dbzer0.com

Posts

0

Comments

200

Joined

2 yr. ago

The brackets were implied by OP.

I.e. "one way: (be ignorant || approve)".

Which of those questions from the article would you describe as loaded enough to imply the quite interesting responses?

I expected to read something like "why are Chinese people stupid?" and then some racist shit - but the answers to those questions are.. Interesting.

The bankruptcy scenario is correct but the first part isn't: you don't have X shares as collateral that you can liquidate. Instead, you have collateral to cover sum Y.

As long as the collateral contract covers enough stock positions the bank won't lose.

That said all of this is assuming standard contracts. If y bank wrote "0% interest and instead 50% of the revenue growth of Twitter" then this would be an easy way to lose money.

Haven't heard of a stupid banker yet, though, so what would the chances be?

Ah that would make sense, thanks!

I haven't found (while cross reading ) details about why the "highly improved" didn't make it to upstream openwrt?

According to their page it's a pure searxng instance. I didn't see anything on my own instance changing so there are three options I see:

• The mentioned server side changes (e.g. A server move you mentioned but could also be server settings, provider settings, etc).
• client side changes: somehow your Firefox provides different information to alter the results
• subjective change: it's always a possibility that either what you searched or your perception was more fine tuned to Cyrillic.

And then there's the obligatory "none or all of the above".

Personally I'd guess it's just a fluke. I gave it a few searches from Firefox mobile on "all languages" and had a mix of mainly English and a bit of German und French in there as results.

Edit: if you're comfortable with that feel free to share some search terms and we can compare results. Would be curious myself!

That... What you describe is a mesh wifi. APs plus roaming. That's a meshed network.

The screenshot had has the criteria included though. Relevant part: either be for children or for everyone.

I use lemmy in two ways: Whitelist: show me my subscriptions and only those (subscribed) Or blacklisted: show me everything else except the things I want to never see.

The latter lead me to this thread! It's two different experiences for me and I get a bit out of my interest bubble from time to time.

Because it's basically axiomatic: ssh uses all keys it knows about. The system can't tell you why it's not using something it doesn't know it should be able to use. You can give a -i for the certificate to check if it doesn't know it because the content is broken or the location.

That said: this doesn't make -v more useful for cases like this, just because there's a reason!

I'd try chat gpt for that! :)

But to give you a very brief rundown. If you have no experience in any of these aspects and are self learning you should expect a long rampup phase! Perhaps there is an easier route but I'm not familiar with it if there is.

First, familiarize yourself with server setups. If you only want to host this you won't have to go into the network details but it could become a cause for error at one point so be warned! The usual tip here is to get yourself familiar enough with docker that you can read and understand docker compose files. The de facto standard for self hosting are linux machines but I have read of people who used Macos and even windows successfully.

One aspect quite unique to themodel landscape is the hardware requirements. As much as it hurts my nvidia despicing heart at this point in time they are the de facto monopolist. Get yourself a card with 12GB VRAM or more (everything below will be painful if you get things running at all. I've tried and pulled or smaller models on a 8GB card but experienced a lot of waiting time and crashes). Read a bit about Cuda on your chosen OS and what their drivers need.

Once you can understand this whole port, container, path mapping and environment variable things.

Then it's going to the github page linked, following their guide and starting a container. Loading models is actually the easier part once you have the infrastructure running.

No offense intended, possible that I miss read your experience level:

I hear a user asking developer questions. Either you go the route of using the publicly available services (dalle and Co) or you start digging into hosting the models yourself. The page you linked hosts trained models to use in your own contexts, not for a "click button and it works".

As a starting point for image generation self hosting I suggest https://github.com/AUTOMATIC1111/stable-diffusion-webui.

For the training part, I'll be very blunt: if you don't indent to spend five to six digit sums on hardware or processing power, forget it. And even then you'd need the raw training data to pull it of.

Perhaps what you want to do use fine tune a pretrained model, that's something I only have a. It of experience in LLMs thohfn(and even there I don't have the hardware to get beyond a personal proof of concept).

I strongly disagree. The burden of proof lies with the one making the claim and this bot has zero transparency regarding its benchmark, database or other criteria. That combined with the fact that it's usage (apparently exclusively) seems to be highly pushed is enough to stay sceptical.

Personally I just blocked it but I have full understanding for anyone downvoting it, simply to communicate "I disagree with the existence of this bot in this context"

Both langchain as well as ollama run locally and are open source.

To be very frank: your post sounds like fear mongering without having even clicked on the link.

Have you not read either the abstract ("calorie deficit not helping") or my comment? ("input on the inefficiency of diets is useless to OP without any impulse on what to do instead")?

I don't understand of what you're aiming for with your oneliners.

The systematic change you describe would make sure that people are "on time" though, just redefining on what that meaning.

Being "on time" I understand as one of two things:

• Being in a place you agreed to be at a time you agreed to.
• Something happens for a lot of people and it was announced beforehand that this will do.

The first one is your responsibility, the latter is impossible to make in a way that works for everyone.

I don't understand how this "change" should look like, what you'd expect people to do for meeting each other and events.

Of course I'm fine with "I take public transport I'll be there between four and six" as a statement for punctuality. Beyond that though?

Whelp that's not helpful on its own though to be honest. "long term lifestyle change" is the key word I am aware which is... Well at least I didn't manage it so far. "just do X" is like telling an alcoholic to "just stop drinking, oh but you need a sip every other hour".

That's very good to know, thank you for sharing! I have only insights into the behavior therapy arm of occupational therapy due to personal contacts there. I can imagine what you describe though because I heard more than one story of "what's wrong with that doctor/therapist, sending that kid with (insert ridiculous diagnostic)".

Uhm I don't know your cultural background but at least around where I am the "own limitations" part is a crucial element of the therapy aspect. Accept your own limits to and work with your strengths.

Managing and accepting restrictions is what is thought here for therapists (at least the fields I'm in closer contact with.

This "widely knowing" people are at least not scientists as the last meta study I am aware of basically says "not enough data": https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7265021/

That said: there is a high risk of discussing local variations on various therapy approaches and it's even highly likely I'd guess that you're absolutely correct for your medical cultural background and my lense is highly dissorted (from your pov) by my own.

You use the word "secret" quite generously but otherwise: yes. They deal in endorphines,playing the long game.