Scipitie @ Scipitie @lemmy.dbzer0.com

Posts

0

Comments

196

Joined

2 yr. ago

Oh and I think that's the root cause for your post: there can not be a common agreement of those positions because they are axiomatic, as in fundamental definitions.

If you define intelligence one way it's very clear that humans have more of it. if you use an (aggressive, in my opinion) species agnostic definition even tied to motivation it's at least not that clear cut.

Personally I'm more with you but I find the thought experiment fascinating. To quote Douglas Adams:

"""For instance, on the planet Earth, man had always assumed that he was more intelligent than dolphins because he had achieved so much—the wheel, New York, wars and so on—whilst all the dolphins had ever done was muck about in the water having a good time. But conversely, the dolphins had always believed that they were far more intelligent than man—for precisely the same reasons."""

That's a philosophical question at the heart: how can you estimate anything like intelligence with neither collaboration nor a common understanding of intelligence?

That's the gust of it from my understanding: cows show patterns that we interpret as intelligence on w human level. Everything after that is by its nature is human centric.

Personally I'm with you but it's impossible to disprove the existence of intelligence on any other scale they doesn't include human motivation. (I.e. the cow has s higher intelligence than any human but we don't know any way to force or motivate it to show it in a way that we could understand.)

It's easier to grasp as a sci-fi concept for me: what happens if aliens come to earth but we cannot figure out their behavior, motivation, tech or thought. And they don't (want to) manage to close the gap. How could we assess intelligence beyond the tech we see? Perhaps they just found it after all.

That small red bulb counteracts the entropy argument because you bring energy (and quite a lot of I recall) into the system.

Would be a sad day if we no longer could reduce entropy locally under the invest of energy.

No it's the complaint about one of the few transparent revenue flows Mozilla managed to pull off.

It's disabled one step deep on the settings

There is a shitload of stuff going wrong with the Mozilla foundation and this doesn't even make the top 10.

That's the reason for my down vote: it's nothing I want this community to focus on. It's basically engagement bait with the topic "ads bad".

But reinforcement makes you heavier and you're back to the drawing board!

It might be easier to first chop arms and legs off to save the excess weigh.lt.

Oh yeah I agree with that and s good point! Google Play Store is convenient but... Well I circumvent it where possible, more due to the tracking mania but your points added to my sensitivity,so thank you!

That's what Arthur describes: you're comparing from my point of view two non issues against each other.

If you don't have the profile that either warrants:

• Google would risk business revenue by having to handle a mittm attack done by them or
• someone investing in an elaborate scheme to get a fingerprint copy

And that being worth it instead of just getting you personally is a very specific threat model where I lack the fantasy on what would warrant that.

Or to give the relevant xkcd:

https://xkcd.com/538/

And to answer your specific question: I personally went with keepass2android and have neither issues nor concerns so far.

It sounds like you accidentally starter with a later book because what you've described is a major plot story being built up for a bit.

From this thread I think you might enjoy it :)

Oh yeah I misunderstood you, completely agree!

He did several "come find me from my pic" videos where users sent in images from around the world and he found where it was taken.

I distinctly remember a fishing spot where he basically found the tight tree under which the pic was taken.

If there's no cherry picking behind the scenes.... Then the answer is "yes, it is transferable".

Hertz is the repetition per second, to get it you simply divide the amount with the time.

This gives you 20 "swings" divided by 2.5 seconds, getting to 8hz, B.

Does that mean that an "all" view is "onl"y all of the subscriptions/places people from my server have?

That's quite interesting.

And thanks!

Got it. Then the bad news is that when with a diagnosis you'll have a more of trial and error in front of you. The good news is that man's of the structural behavioral tools die ADHD will help non ADHD people as well as at their core they work against overburdening the brain.

I think you over worry then die a simple reason: There meds will be clear in few days, a therapist will find ways to help you and you will find things that work for you!

Actually the medication is one of the cleanest diagnostics tools in my opinion: if they give you energy and push you up then your brain did its job already. If they call you down and provide focus then they (literally) filled the gaps in the brain.

Hey friend,

Honestly I don't understand what the difference would be for you.

There's no badge or membership. Personally I had three benefits of my diagnosis (which is two decades back by now and was as an adult):

I had an easier time understanding my own brain and... Well world perception.

I was able to easier look for help and talk about it.

I was able to test medication (didn't work our for me back then she took side effects but that's a different story).

To get a strangers "judgment": If you just want an excuse for your low energy and failing here and there you don't have it. If you want guidance and new approaches to improve your life for yourself and then here's your diagnosis: one of us!

Either way I wish you the best :)

How is a list of seven(!) different analyzed potential factors reduced by you with a "wtf" to one of those?

And then followed by an anecdote, a correlated studies off topic to the study described and a bit of conspiracy theory (note: one of the few I even support myself, but i's out of scope of this article!).

You're actively harming the points you want to make by jumping onto the wrong targets.

No one forces unattended updates. And containerd is already living in the userspace.

If every dev would live on a kernel level stability approach we'd will not have a containerd release at all.

Interested amateur disclaimer!

Fast rotating certificates always more secure because the timeframe between beach discovery and system inherent revoke is shorter.

How big the impact in terms of real life is I can't even guess because of the (from my perspective) weird circumstances they must happen to depend on the certificate lifetime itself.

I guess it's just one of these "every but helps" factors more than specific use cases.

Seems like a historic artefact to me as well. And one of their mentioned points was "no sync via http" which even for 2006 makes me... hesitant.

And their history section ends in 2007, couldn't find a feature comparison in their quick start guide.

Yay a rabbit hole! Thanks for the key words :)

Can you give a link or description how anarchy counts be implement in a easy there is resilient to a subverted centralization of power that does not truly on an active majority?

Because we don't have that, sadly. And I've never seen a concept that takes a silent and passive majority into consideration.