Skip Navigation

Posts
5
Comments
495
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • What do the words socialist and communist actually mean to you?

    I think with the way you're using the word socialist, what you actually mean is social democrat, which is a newer term people use to mean capitalism but with heavy regulation and strong welfare / social safety nets.

    When you ask people who are actually anti-capitalists and consider themselves some flavor of socialist or communist to distinguish between the two you will get as many different answers as people you've asked. In Marxist theory socialism is generally understood as a transitional state towards communism. Historical events led to communism being used mostly to refer to the authoritarian ideology championed by the Bolsheviks, so people started using socialism to differentiate themselves from that definition.

    The only thing you'll get most leftists to agree on is that both socialist and communist mean anti-capitalist, and those who disagree are confused liberals.

  • I think it's the same issue as conservatives suddenly realizing their favorite band or movie/tv franchise is gasp woke!

    They passively consume media without analyzing it beyond the surface level, then are personally offended that they were "baited" into consuming what they see as woke propaganda.

    Then they also notice a trend of more overt progressive elements in media because of an increase in surface-level corporate pandering, and they blame "wokeness" for bad storytelling without realizing people who are actually woke hate the shallow pandering too.

  • Hillary undermined his whole presidency.

    Yes, the fact that Russia ran a coordinated disinformation campaign that favored Trump does undermine his legitimacy a bit, but let's not miss the forest for the trees. The fact that Trump lost the popular vote in 2016 and lost the election entirely in 2020 is more significant.

    Al Gore tried to use law to win election.

    61,000 ballots were not counted by mistake. Gore used the law to try and have them counted and the conservative supreme court interfered for political reasons. Gore was in the right.

    Conspiracy theory

    The amount of evidence supporting this theory rivals the theory of gravity.

  • A bot would surely have better grammar.

  • Hilary with making false russian claim

    In what way do claims of Russian interference - which has some truth to it btw - directly result in the overturning of an election?

    Gore with all the counting shenanigans

    Insane to present an example of an election being manipulated in Bush's favor as an attempt by Gore to overturn an election. How are we supposed to have a discussion when we clearly live in different realities?

    How were they going to overturn an election by occupying a building?

    The attack on the Capitol was part of a wider plan orchestrated by Trump and his backers. The fake electors, the call to Georgia's secretary of state, the baseless accusations of voter fraud... All of these combine to paint a pretty clear picture. Hell, the crowd at the Capitol called to hang Mike Pence because he refused to count the fake Certificates of Ascertainment.

    I'm only responding for the benefit of others since I know you're just going to deny all of this or try to claim Democrats did the same or worse, but I really do hope you overcome your delusions someday.

  • Legal warfare, I dont like it either, but the losers do this a lot.

    Show me one time Democrats have attempted to stop the certification of an election by force. You can't just pretend this happens as a standard matter of course.

    what was May 29th?

    May 29th was a riot and not an insurrection because it had nothing to do with trying to overturn an election. Are you getting it yet?

  • Are you suggesting that an attempt to halt the certification of a presidential election endorsed and encouraged by the sitting president in the hopes of avoiding abdicating power is equivalent to a protest over police brutality?

  • Is that what you think happened on J6? Failure is not the same as giving up.

  • I was just intuiting the answer based on watching a bunch of educational videos, I am not qualified to do the math on this lol.

  • No explosion, just radiation and heat. Everyone nearby is dead, just not instantly.

  • If they do replace him, it will just be with Kamala. The only thing up in the air would be who to appoint as her running mate.

    IMO they should just do it ASAP. I honestly think Kamala would attract way more voters than Biden. She certainly has her issues but no worse than Biden's and she's way better on optics.

  • Any good leftist candidate would mobilize opposition voters, that is unavoidable. It's no reason to not run a good candidate.

  • The only ones concerned about malaria deaths are also concerned about the ecosystem. The people who are not concerned about the ecosystem are also not concerned about malaria deaths.

  • The above commenter called for employers to discriminate against applicants on the basis of their political views. I simply pointed out that's a bad idea and you went off about "both extremes" and how the left has gone too far.

    I'm so sick of this shit. Yes, the j6er is a moron, but removing worker protections against political discrimination is also a moronic response to this issue. Who here is being "extreme"?

  • Employers should proactively inquire about one's political leanings before hiring someone.

    You surely see why this would be terrible, right?

  • It does actually. The status quo is maintained by authoritarians utilizing the state to enact violence against the working class.

  • I need to see some receipts for these wild claims.

  • The most effective method to improving our democracy is using our democracy. US history has demonstrated this repeatedly.

    Meaningful progress has only ever been made in the US after mass movements engaged in direct action and protests (often met with violent state repression), and even then the legislation that's made is usually much less than the people wanted. This is not a sign of a democracy that functions for the people.