Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)SA
Posts
1
Comments
439
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • To be completely fair, even open-source AIs are a little bit of a black box due to the way neural networks work - but I'd greatly appreciate if we at least knew the parameters on which it is trained.

    It is absolutely possible to train all sorts of biases in a closed-source AI, and that's what would be very hard in an open-source model. You can roughly set up outputs at whatever. In other ways, using open-source practically removes the malicious human factor (without removing positive impact)

    Open-source models also can't be restricted, paywalled or limited in any meaningful way, which is also vital.

  • Ah, that name was left from when they've been open-source, which us why I advocate for the emergence of GPL-licensed projects.

    The open-source license for GPT model was very relaxed, which OpenAI took advantage of and, once it could afford their own programmer staff, closed the code with all the contributions all the programmers from all over the world have made.

    It's an extremely dick move, and it was repeated by Google, too.

  • I mean, the principle is correct, the treatment of the maintainer is not.

    The person is volunteering to do hard meticulous work, and then gets yelled at in the most terrible manner.

    It's important to get the job done right, yes. It's also important to politely direct to mistakes and respect person's dignity.

  • Agreed here.

    We should be ready for the harsh reality - we just should strive to improve it ourselves.

    It takes a big heart to treat people differently from how you were treated, but that's what makes us humans.

    And for as long as the reality is the way it is, we have to brace up to have a chance in challenging it.

  • Fair enough

    But I thought we speak general population here. Many points raised under this post are not really controversial on Lemmy :D

    With that being said, I still see this goddamn ChatGPT all over Lemmy. Like, come on, Lemmy userbase, you're better than that.

  • Small counter point: while it is heavily important to be able to shake off life hardships, we should still fight for the world with less unnecessary harm.

    Particularly, when you go about professional pursuits, we shouldn't turn them into a fierce competition that would benefit no one, but should instead stand together and collaborate to make this world better for us all. And in that regard, comfort culture is a much better fit than the culture of the grind; granted, you don't crank it up to the extremes and still develop and learn new stuff to become better at what you love.

  • People are crazy when they promote closed-source AI (okay, okay, generative model) projects like ChatGPT, Bard etc.

    This is literally one of the most important technologies of the future, and after all the times technology companies screwed them (us) up big time and monopolized the Internet, they go into the same trap again and again.

    First they surrendered the free Internet, now they surrender the new frontiers.

    Wake up, people. Go HuggingFace, advocate for free AI, and ideally - for a GPL one. We cannot afford for this part of our future to be taken away from us.