Ouch. The questions were not even hardballs. When the interviewer stated that the system is fair because one freely agrees to the company's terms and conditions of employment, I would have been the one laughing. If "starving" is the alternative then perhaps the bargaining power of the employers is a bit unbalanced.
But I don't judge the guy. He must have been tripping on nerves. It would have been a good idea to pick someone a bit more prepared to face this kind of pressure. But hey, he was brave. Maybe they got the opportunity with short notice and no one else was willing to step up.
This feels like one of those chain messages that we would get on Facebook asking us to do something like posting "I don't give permission to Facebook to use my data". Except that this time it is actually true!
I have added "_nomap" to my SSID and now I have to read the manual for the wifi extender, which by default appends _EXT to the SSID 🙄
I would much rather see a "_yesmap" opt-in policy!
Good catch!
Mali voted in favor. The representative accidentally pressed the wrong button 😅 She corrected the record immediately after: https://media.un.org/en/asset/k1j/k1jb1nxz0o?kalturaStartTime=6641