Saik0 @ Saik0Shinigami @lemmy.saik0.com

Nope. I don't talk about myself like that.

---

Read more

Posts

1

Comments

1,968

Joined

2 yr. ago

There's enough plastic around to recycle it... PLA, PETG, ABS... can all be shredded, crushed, and recycled.

I do have a wife. I pulled up our current budget and looked. We'd have to cut a couple of things but I could make it work pretty easily. It's the kids that would make it actually hard. But at this point they're spoiled enough. They'll live (they can live without food right?).

Edit: missed an entire word.

Edit 2: the real answer is that you can consume more than 47k.. if you have to spend an extra 5k a year, you could keep doing that for the rest of your life and be fine... you'll just make a little less each year until you exhaust the 1m... but you'll likely die before you do.

Example....

At 55k/yr, you'll exhaust at year 43. Which the kids would be long gone out the house by then which would lighten the consumption again... so really probably longer. Would probably last 60+ years as long as you maintain some frugality...

Edit3: This does assume that costs don't rise (fat luck here)... that the 4.66 is static (which it's not... and can go up or down)... etc... You could also invest in "riskier things" with higher returns to get more money... general market returns can be higher and are only a minor "risk".

High yield savings is currently at 4.66% at best right now...

With just 1 million in a bank account... That's 47k a year in interest. Considering that I don't need to work in this scenario (And thus wouldn't need a car, and all the other costs that come with needing to maintain stuff for a job)... I could probably make that work for the rest of my life.

So now.. I'm supposed to manage company assets and workers private assets on company paid infrastructure? In what world is this a sane feature request? Who green-lit this?

As a default behavior this is stupid as shit. I could see this being an "added benefit" optionally. Not that I'd ever want to use it personally... but backup storage is a cost and some people don't want to pay it.

You’re wrong and didn’t contribute anything meaningful to the conversation.

So you think that out of all the hate on the internet... NONE of it is constructed shit in people's own head?(keep in the mind that the article itself talks about personality disorders and DSM-5, literally talking about things like schizophrenia and ADHD... mental disorders that affect how we think are in that book). That this number is so infallibly 0% that my thought doesn't contribute ANY meaningful value to discuss at all? You sure that it contributed nothing to the conversation and that's why you downvoted? Cause it would appear to me that you've just chosen to ignore the words, ascribe your own meaning to stuff that wasn't there and then downvoted because you didn't like it.

It's clear that this is happening on the internet in many cases. In saner parts of the internet (sometimes even here on lemmy) you'll see two people arguing, a misconception clear up, and magically all the "hate" dissolved away and both parties walk away amicably.

Hate is stuff like: ableism, misogyny, racism, homophobia, transphobia.

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/hate

It only means that as an adjective, or under pretense where it's clear that we're talking about a class of people, if that's the case it wasn't clear to me and I just took it as a general overall "the world seems more hateful". Which it wasn't used any other way in the comments up to this point this way nor the article itself. So now you've constructed some other thing that nobody has referenced just so you can argue some other point that nobody else was apparently making. Keep in mind that the whole thread started with "Hostile" from the article, and not "hate". The article doesn't reference anything about any specific classes of people, and even talks about personality disorders (so medical perspective) rather than " ableism, misogyny, racism, homophobia, transphobia" and other... uh... character flaws(? might not be the correct phrase to use but maybe the point comes across) that shitty people have.

Edit: Oh and I don't care about downvotes. But the fact that YOU downvoted the comment was part of the point. It literally is adding context to the actual discussion we're actively having. It's directly related behavioral response that's worthy of discussing in this particular discussion. Trust me I get down-voted plenty on Lemmy and couldn't care less otherwise. Usually for not immediately jumping on a bandwagon.

Okay? I never said "ALL HATE on the internet is bullshit"... I said "I wonder how much is just people constructing shit in their own head."

This is exactly my point. You chose to interpret my words in a way that I clearly would have never intended if you actually spent time to read the words and understand them for what they were rather than some magical interpretation that clearly was never said.

Edit: Thanks for the downvote too! Proves the point further.

Edit2: And on your specific point I would argue otherwise. In the past, humans would just kill each other rather than yelling words through a machine. Literal murder -> Mean words is a de-escalation. We can do better for sure... do not misconstrue that, but to claim that we're more hateful now, when history shows us murdering each other for less is a bit silly of a stance to take.

but it takes tow to argue

Eh... It really doesn't though does it? One side can be sincerely stating points of fact/logic and others often can and do often ascribe that as "you're a terrible person for saying that!".

We are all responsible for what we say , good and bad

Good and bad are subjective though. There is often no black and white. I often cite and source things to show that I'm not stating anything as a matter of opinion... and out of the blue some rando comes out and tries ascribing some sense of moral straw-man claiming that I must believe something or another. Here's an example from literally last night...

I made no statement that could even be construed as putting words in other people's mouths... yet someone straw-manned me by definition (and didn't even know the word for it) by Smee there trying to make some grand point that nobody was even making at that point but they thought I was.

Edit: Actually you don't even need to look at an entirely different thread... Just look at the other response to me. Someone who wasn't even in the conversation comes out of the blue and ascribes something I never said nor could ever have been construed as and took it to some straw-man end game nonsense.

There’s just so many uncaring shits online.

I wonder how much "hate" on the internet is this... but the reality is that is how you "see" them in your head rather than what they're actually saying/believe. A lot of negative responses to some of the things I say is a strawman of what I actually believe/said.

Nah. That Doom Guys MO. Rip and tear until it's done.

doom 2016

Is a video game. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doom_(2016_video_game)

In preparing her victim impact statement for the court, she struggled to find a way to properly represent her brother’s voice

Should clarify that the woman wrote the script. The AI just generated the voice and image. The AI read the woman's script who wrote it in the tone of her brother putting aside her own feelings.

until it expands and eatsbthe planets before it implodes.

Food chain.

It was purchased a while ago by a less than reputable company. But the service was court tested no log. I've not had issue... but the risk could still be there that they've started logging.

Edit: Can always set an exit point in another country so that its unlikely that logs can be pulled regardless.

Edit2: oh and its scriptable to grab the port assigned from the pia app and feed it to qbittorent :chef's kiss:

people like to shit on PIA. but they still support port forwarding.

Yet again... You fundamentally have the wrong answer...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GitHub_Copilot

GitHub Copilot is a code completion and automatic programming tool developed by GitHub and OpenAI

https://github.com/features/copilot

GitHub copilot was literally developed WITH OpenAI the creators of ChatGPT... and you can run o1, o3, o4 directly in there.

https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/using-github-copilot/ai-models/changing-the-ai-model-for-copilot-code-completion

By default, Copilot code completion uses the GPT-4o Copilot, a fine-tuned GPT-4o mini based large language model (LLM).

It defaults to 4o mini.

No, not basically no.

https://mashable.com/article/openai-o3-o4-mini-hallucinate-higher-previous-models

By OpenAI's own testing, its newest reasoning models, o3 and o4-mini, hallucinate significantly higher than o1.

Stop spreading misinformation. The company itself acknowledges that it hallucinates more than previous models.

I would say GitHub copilot ( that uses a gpt model ) uses more Wh than chatgpt, because it gets blasted more queries on average because the “AI” autocomplete just triggers almost every time you stop typing or on random occasions.

They did... You just refuse to acknowledge it. It's no longer a discussion of simply 3Wh when GitHub copilot is making queries every time you pause typing. It could easily equate to hundreds or even thousands of queries a day (if not rate limited). That fully changes the scope of the argument.

If the premise of your argument is fundamentally flawed, then you're not having a reasoned debate. You just a zealot.

if you can play an item back. you can enumerate it.