Saik0 @ Saik0Shinigami @lemmy.saik0.com

Nope. I don't talk about myself like that.

---

Read more

Posts

1

Comments

1,980

Joined

2 yr. ago

Man... talk about confidently wrong. That's not the document. And the link/pdf works fine.

Glad to see that you have great interactions with other people as well! I hope you don't forget to downvote brigade them too!

Interesting that the document was issued by the City itself and clearly says "zoning code". Weird. I mean superstar you can't possibly be wrong!

Edit: oh and to preempt this, cause you might make the dumbest argument ever... No this isn't old. I'll even give you a big old arrow to point out the date for you.

You might want to call the Planning Services Division at Oshkosh and tell them that you're right and they're wrong!

Because only 1500 of the 1700 nukes working would make such a big difference.

Or 10 of the 1700... Doesn't matter how many, you have to think of it as xxx amount of the top populated cities. The top 10 populated cities will automatically decimate the population of many countries.

I think it's pretty safe to say that they likely don't have ALL their warheads in functional order... but even if it's just 2% of them... it's enough to fuck over several countries for a long time.

The guy allegedly worked in security on the base,

Nothing to keep security over if the nukes aren't functional/maintained.

task manager forcing you to restart it.

That I can believe... The "Restart" option is just a taskkill and re-run the process. But that's not "Explorer restarting itself", that's task manager restarting it for you under one specific, but probably the most common scenario.

Of the offenders for whom gender was known, 90.3 percent were males.

Of stats that include "fathers", "husbands", "sons", "boyfriends", etc... You don't see how those stats as you present it is meaningless to the OP's discussion and proves "Men are dying an order of magnitude more."? Men can kill their fathers, husbands, sons, etc...

You're talking about who's doing the killing, not what gender the people who were killed were.

Of the 12,996 murder victims in 2010 for which supplemental data were received, most (77.4 percent) were male

Source: your source.

You're cherry picking really dumb shit. Especially when your own source PROVES the person you're arguing with correct.

Don't get me wrong... What you should have quoted:

Of the female murder victims for whom the relationships to their offenders were known, 37.5 percent were murdered by their husbands or boyfriends. (Based on Expanded Homicide Data Table 2 and 10.)

This is a problem. But that's of the 22.6% of homicides on the table already (removing the 77.4% males), so we're talking about ~8.5% with no given information about what that looks like in the reverse, nor what the Female-Female rates are. That's a loaded stat without the other two being present on the page as well. If raw numbers match or are similar enough... then it's not what you're insinuating it is at all.

The only actually relevant thing you can probably stat with that page is that men kill more women than women kill men. Except that would be expected since Men on average are physically stronger and are more capable of defending against an average Woman. You would expect more "success" in men attempting to kill women, and more "failure" in women attempting to kill men with just that fact alone.

And lastly, since you already omitted data..

Law enforcement reported 665 justifiable homicides in 2010. Of those, law enforcement officers justifiably killed 387 felons, and private citizens justifiably killed 278 people during the commission of a crime.

I bet this also has a directionality to it as well that would need to be applied.

The kernel is part of the operating system.

I would argue it IS the operating system. Everything else is just fluff that helps the kernel do it's job.

Edit: Or helps YOU as the user interact with the kernel.

That aliexpress device doesn't tell you what wattage or data speed the cable will max out doing. Just what wattage it's currently doing (to which you'd need to make sure that the device you're testing with on the other side is capable and not having it's own issues). Also can't tell you if the cable is have intermittent problems. If all you care about is wattage, then fine. But I find myself caring more about the supported data speeds and quality of the cable.

But yes, I agree that cables should just be marked what they're rated for... However it's possible well built cables exceed that spec and could do better than they're claiming which just puts us in the same boat of not really knowing.

Edit: oh! and that aliexpress tester is only 4 lines(usb2.0 basically)... usb 3.0 in type c is 24 pins... You're not testing jack shit on that aliexpress. The device I linked will actually map the pins in the cable and will find you breaks as well.

I would agree with you if there were a simple way to tell what the USB-C cable I have in my hand

https://caberqu.com/home/39-ble-caberqu-0611816327412.html

This would do it.

Bless your heart. You really are special.

Edit: Now you've gone through my recent posts and downvoted each of them. Congrats! What a waste of your time. But I'm "the troll".

Edit2: WAAAAAAHHHHH

I killed it from task manager though.

"End task"

You're special eh?

It’s pretty normal to have fences on property lines, why pay 4x the price for fences?

Because that would be a shared fence. Which all parties that adjoin that fence would have ownership stake in and therefore share the costs of.

There isn’t shared upkeep?

And yet here we are looking at a picture of someone attempting poorly to upkeep a fence. Gee golly did you just talk yourself into a circle hur durr?

If you want to maintain yours, you do, if you neighbor does they do.

Not if it's a shared asset. Now you're describing individual fences set back into the property. Gee golly did you just talk yourself into a circle hur durr?

It’s a fence, you can literally leave it for 2 decades and it won’t do anything.

Depends on where you live, the quality of the wood, if there's any critters doing damage... etc...
Tell me you're not a homeowner without telling me you're not a homeowner. I have fucking cinderblock walls, and even they require maintenance more often than every decade. Let alone 2.

What upkeep are you referring to?

Literally look at the post you knucklehead.

I’m sure you could find the $10 and not need to bitch with your neighbor over the price of a coffee… yeah?

If it's a shared wall, simply chucking $10 of shit lumber at the fence could actually make the property worse... Case and point look at the fucking picture of the OP. If it's shared, that could be a legal problem if all parties don't unanimously agree.

You mean the exact situation as before that got remedied by talking to them and coming to an agreement…?

No. Because lots of people out there are fucking looney tunes. And lots of people out there don't give a flying fuck about you. Many will only look out for themselves and cause you whatever problems they want to cause because to them it doesn't fucking matter. Case and point. OP is bitching that it looks like shit. It's not even their fucking fence to complain about. The fact that we see 2 fences here shows that each property is maintaining their own fence.

Where I am you sign a covenant when you buy the land, if you don’t sign the convenant, while you don’t get to buy the land.

Okay Buffy.

Edit: LMFAO So now you report this comment... Good job!

So which rule does this post break? Me pointing out that you did the same thing you claimed I did is rule 1 is it? I was clear what I was talking about, you were just being argumentative as shit.

The problem is the shared ownership aspect... Eg, your neighbor moves... new neighbors. They don't want the fence or refuse to pay for the shared upkeep on the fence. Now you're stuck with the bill or fighting them over it.

No, but you've stated something that's factually not true. And with all the shit that's streamed on the internet, this is nothing near "weird".

Sorry that you don't know what you're talking about.

over 3 hours and 20 minutes now by the way... Explorer.exe hasn't restarted. What you claim has NEVER been the behavior.

Edit: I'm killing the stream. It's been over 4:20... I think the point is proven. Still no explorer.exe. Because when you kill the process, it does not restart.

If the fence is directly on the boundary, then it's a shared fence. You set it in a foot to establish in good faith that it's strictly yours. Shared fences have a bunch of legal issues just because sharing property with other people often sucks. If you've lived in a development with shared fences you should look at your HOA's CC&Rs. There's always a lengthy chapter on how the walls should be handled. Just to cut out the legal nonsense that always comes with shared fences/walls.

Considering that the posts driven into the ground are still on the neighbors property... and the nails clearly don't extend past that. No. It doesn't extend into OPs property.

Further, it's not normal for a fence to be directly on the property boundary. You inset it a foot or two. In this case you can see that OPs fence is also between this taller fence and the camera. There's "dead space" between the property due to the fences. The boundary will actually be between them somewhere.

While this looks like shit... specifically because of the obvious poor craftsmanship. This is literally $5 nailsnips from harbor freight fixable.

What if they had used 12-inch nails? 3-foot ones?

I refuse to whataboutism a picture where we can literally observe what is happening.

Not their fence.

Now we not only have to sacrifice our privacy to some 3rd party contractor

No. It's run by the government itself. https://www.gsa.gov/. Nothing about this is 3rd party.

Edit: There was a push at one point to connect to a site called ID.ME... THAT was a disaster. Login.gov is good IMO... Must better than the alternative.

No. It's not. I spun up a vm and killed explorer.exe. How long should I be waiting? Cause I"m several minutes in and explorer hasn't restarted itself yet. Also tested it on my VR computer (only non-linux physical machine in the house).

Here I'll even stream it for you.

<removed>

Edit: Over 19 minutes now... Still waiting for it to restart...

Edit2: Over an hour now... Still waiting for it to automatically restart. BTW the machine is windows 11. Latest patch/update.

Edit3: pulling the stream. Ran it for over 4 hours. The point is proven. It doesn't restart itself.

If you kill explorer.exe manually it doesn't respawn. You have to star the process yourself again.

Unless something changed in the past year.

Anything that hooks into explorer.exe tends to require windows to reboot.