Sagifurius @ Sagifurius @lemm.ee

Posts

1

Comments

497

Joined

2 yr. ago

Motorcycles pay the same at the meter so

Now you're just lying and being purposefully obtuse . Half the time the parking pricks fine bikers for sharing a spot.

Human rights commission says different, motorcycles aren't charged less.

The recent round of anti semitism incidents has nothing to do with nazis, though, I suspect the same in Australia, this is probably politicians bring politicians more than anything.

This from someone willfully ignoring these people pay their share of property and fuel.taxes that pay for all this, in many cases much more tax than people complaining

There's the sanctimonious wankery I was looking for.

Chevy Suburban has been produced and sold well since 1960. This isn't a new dilemma, it's clearly shitty planning and most likely being amplified by people who don't own much of anything whining. I lived in that part of BC for 12 years, well familiar with how they'll try make themselves feel better about themselves via creating scenarios where they are morally superior, not broke losers.

I use, for my business, a 1986 GMC 3500. It's two wheel drive, manual, rust free due to maintenance and every bit as long as these "bro dozers" but apparently I shouldn't be able to park at my suppliers. I was previously using a 8900lb gvw 2500, but I feel like Chevrolet overstated the load rating back then to avoid emissions or something, if you actually try put the 1.5 tons claimed in, the suspension is no longer suspension.

Classic case of responding not to what is said, but who is saying it. In short....fuck off moron.

won't be. There's federal legislation that basically says a vehicle has to be large to burn fuel like that, so you can't make a small truck unless it makes small car mileage. The idea was that the auto manufacturers would improve mileage if forced, but you know how it usually goes when politicians try to direct engineers to make bullshit physics reality.

where the he is (de)? Denmark?

Well yeah. They run well and are quite comfortable, easy to work on. Most problems can be solved in a day without years of training.

"I said the same thing using different terms that make me feel clever and moral"

Oh ok. I had the initial impression your truck was a bit older, but yeah, no, you're not significantly lighter, than the gas powered 2500s and 3500s. You are significantly lighter than a diesel quad cab 4x4, but only if your a regular cab 2wd gas job. Your ratio would probable be 3:43, 3:08, 3:23, something like that, you don't get lower than 4:10 in a half ton generally, and even that's rare. The cylinder shut off was annoying joke, they quit doing that for a reason, it's really problematic and it takes the same amount of energy to move a certain vehicle a certain distance at a certain speed, regardless of 4 or 8 cylinders. Engines of different manufacture do use different amounts of fuel to do the same thing, not denying that. GM set up a scenario where you could see in real time if the exact same specced vehicle would get better mileage with four or 8 cylinders working. they didn't. I bet you get around 17-19 mpg, which is been the chevy v8 standard average milage for a roughly 5.5 liter v8 powered pickup with a rear end ratio somewhere around 3:40, since 1970. I know you do get better mileage than when the cylinders are fully activated, but, they only activate when they're needed, so, its kinda more marketing than anything, you'd get good mileage all 8 activated and not working harder too. GM is famous for shit like this, their old 4 barrel carbs with the tiny primaries and massive secondaries just lead to the secondaries opening ALL THE TIME, which resulted in worse mileage than a big 2 barrel carb or a equal bore 4 barrel. nevermind they were at the same time putting 800 cfm carbs on motors did better with 500, raised vacuum is beneficial, because people saw "800 cfm" as "just like my drag racing heroes". A significant part of corporate engineering is marketing driven. you never need bigger than 500 cfm unless you have an 8 liter ish motor exceeding 7000 rpm, or some sort of forced induction.

It's a way to demonstrate longer vehicles are nothing new, and still being driven besides. This is an urban planning failure being presented as otherwise.

I mean that sounds clever if you don't think about when the vehicles being bitched about were designed.

? I'm sure you're aware GM used the exact same gasoline motors in the half tons as it did in the 3500s. You can have pretty much the same gas mileage as the half ton as long as you make sure to find a 2500 or 3500 with the 3:73 or 4:10 rear axle ratio, not the 4:88 that shows up fairly often, but way more carrying capacity. If it's throttle body era, the 3500s did have bigger injectors, just change them to the 1500 injectors.

These trucks are no longer than a 1978 Cadillac, wtf designed these parking spaces?

I feel like I'd have a lock on my freezer, if that's where i kept the bodies.

God you people are morons