He doesn't have money. He has assets. That means he need's to take out a loan against his assets. And who would have done such a thing for a money pit that was twitter?
Dishonored was fun but not as visceral, also felt way too overpowered. I think I only replayed it once or twice. Mount & Blade is a real challenge but it's clunky and has no real feedback when landing hits, you just sort of go through them or bounce off. Still, another one of my favourite games though.
Loved the melee in this game. Have been disappointed with every first person sword fighting game ever since. Skyrim came after this and was such a letdown in that regard.
Nevertheless, these models are trained with broad yet shallow data. As such, they are glorified tech demos meant to wet the appetite of businesses to generate high value customers who could further tune a model for a specific purpose. If you haven't already, I suggest you do the same. Curate a very specific dataset and very clear examples. The models can already demonstrate the warping of different types of lenses. I think it would be very doable to train one to better reflect the curving geometry you're looking for.
Most likely use something like Google's t5 here. This is basically only meant to translate sentences into something a diffusion model understands. Even chatgpt is just going to formulate a prompt for a diffusion model in the same way and isn't going to inherently give it any more contextual understanding.
The simple answer is they are simply not there yet for understanding complex concepts. And I suspect that the most impressive images of impossible concepts they can drum up are mostly by chance or by numbers.
Starfleet is very bureaucratic. I'd imagine a massive reason not everyone has everything is simply the hoops you'd have to jump through to acquire it. Imagine the safety regulations necessary for a galaxy class starship! Similar applies to holodecks. They are super dangerous. And you can't just build a mansion anywhere livable as there's usually something living there you would disrupt in the first place.
This highlights the problem with using that term. The two particles assume a state at the same time at a distance. It has 0% to do with the colloquial term.
They just have to lie back and squirm