Rooki @ Rooki @lemmy.world

I am Rooki Cookie. I am a programmer and i try to help everyone :)

---

Read more

Posts

14

Comments

1,125

Joined

2 yr. ago

Moderating

---

Me waiting for someone arguing there are no angry guys here.

That if we use their api (for free) we need to have a link to MBFC.

Why do we need it removed?

But one thing you need to give them is that they give you the option to opt out All in one switch and not switch 9999999 switches.

We blocked all piracy related content that isnt a meta discussion about it. And that community and their mods didnt cooperate on removing non meta discussions from the community.

https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/#41-piracy

Logfiles and partially a public site i forgot what url directly but it tells you the desync / delay of certain federations between instances.

Hi,

we will investigate this matter, we have some issue on slrpnk.net too and i think it has some relation to yours.

Thanks for your patience.

https://www.wired.com/story/nasa-boeing-starliner-return-home-spacex/ for non archive version.

But still no alternative or improvement ideas. So i guess we will have to stick to MBFC if there is no one with any ideas.

Thats impossible. It would break a lot of connections, federation. Saves could be done if the account is on the same instance.

I did not remova any comments? Those removed comments are renoved by mods of the community.

But the issue is there is no other alternative that has an ordered and automatable access.

Then the other option was to have a community made "source" but that brings up the issue with "User x is not fit to contribute", "Remove the bad rating on site xyz.com" etc. tadah back to the start with the "crying" ablut topic x.

We are still working on such an system as this could at least reduce the shitstorm about having no option to alter the rating. But its not final that decision.

No of course not, some were constructive and gave an alternative site or adjusted format how they expect it to look.

I just reflect how it feels to get such bad feedback without any real feedback in it.

Feedback includes many types of input but not: Disliking it because of personal opinion, because service x rated your favorite news page badly.

My feedback to that emotional feedback was just my emotion back to it.

If we wanted everyones opinion on MBFC yes then we would loved this response from you. But feedback is not just MBFC BAD!!!!!!!!

What if theoretically give you feedback on your math test: "0 Points Because ITS BAD!!!!!" Then you would think why was it bad? The formula ? The results? The readability? Or were my books that i read bad?

"MBFC BAD DESTROY IT" isnt valid. Its just personal opinion. We responded to the real feedback accordingly and will implement them soon.

No, there was some good. Feedback, those "I HATE MBFC DESTROY IT" Feedback was not constructive.

We reduced it a bit. It will take affect after next deployment ( tomorrow )

That was sadly the point why we didnt recognized that as feedback, rather as just being childish because some site said some bad things about their favorite news page.

At least we got some real feedback that were constructive. We will implement those and deploy it.

The wall of text we will reduce in the next update. The others we will discuss with the team.