RojoSanIchiban @ RojoSanIchiban @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

434

Joined

2 yr. ago

I started working remotely during covid THEN bought a Tesla. Musk is the moron king of morons.

... they were supposed to be a misunderstood "villain" just trying to continue existing.

What do you mean!? Everyone knows Obama is a Muslim Anti-Fa Satanist dijon eater in a tan suit!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

At least it'll be more powerful than a gorilla.

The Flavor Aid would be less messy, but I guess I won't complain either way.

McCarthy scabbing during the SAG-AFTRA strike, acting the part of, "Guy With a Spine."

Or hyperbole, apparently :(

Four weeks, two months, whatever, they're both still infinitely more than Americans are guaranteed, which is zero.

Including voting for Jeffries?

NNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOoooooooooooo!

Then I'd be an E.U. citizen? Fuck yeah! Give me two months of vacation!

Found a video feed of the Mar-a-Lago hallway outside Trump's suite

Holoimage taken just prior to Kirk's use of Lover's Gambit

Putin licks dildos that were in Lavrov's ass.

The previous statement is absolute truth because I declare it so. Now run the story on RT and Pravda and whatever other propaganda rags run BS like this.

I'm not entirely sure how to take my more-than-slightly-cheeky response being interpreted so seriously, but I'm happy it's fostering true thought and discussion on the subject.

My dryer-than-Mojave humor has its moments, at least.

My real take on this would be such that the case of modifications for rolling coal is a widely known "zero gain" modification that accomplishes nothing other than allowing for the forementioned act, and yes, absolutely the off-the-cuff verbage would be changed to 'modifying for the intent of enabling coal rolling...' or whatever works linguistically to narrow the scope just to this act.

I did genuinely try to word it in such a manner that someone accidentally doing it with a modified vehicle wouldn't be at risk of losing their license, but yep, naturally that allows an interpretation of any modification being at odds with the "law" and it's clear I don't actually write legislation for a living.

In the grand scheme of things, of course there are totally far, FAR more emissions from otherwise acceptable vehicles than the few that do this, but I'd like to think a majority of sound-minded people see the act as so mind-bendingly douchey, that it deserves to be a crime (and I truly do, for one).

He's be more honest as a zombie.

Oops, sorry, uhh let me contact the admirals... oh uh, probably should hit the sonic shower if you got any on you...

Too much raktajino, Rom.

That stuff will cause anyone to blast off at the slightest inclination.

That's why Keiko convinced O'Brien to swap to it.

Her: "I'll get us a table, can you order me a large pumpkin spice latte with a shot and double mocha* ? Thanks babe!"

Him: Ffffffffuuuuuuuuuuuuuu

*I have no idea if this is a thing, I never go to starbucks

Fair. While I'd defend the name as being targeted at only the offenders' insecurities, which also includes the truck-nuts-trans quip, I understand how it could cause a larger negative cultural impact to a group or groups that is/are already unduly disparaged.

Additional group studies will be performed and suggestions are welcome.

Perhaps the "Coal Rollers Are Pissants, Fundamentally Undeserving Cars/trucKs Act"

It has a certain je ne sais quois, I think, but needs more work.

I like it!

Adding it to my proposal.