Rogue @ Rogue @feddit.uk

Posts

0

Comments

377

Joined

2 yr. ago

This article just reads that the authors have solely set out to draw the conclusion they'd already decided upon.

 A study of more than 400,000 UK road accidents found that when “risky or aggressive manoeuvres” played a part in collisions, there was a significant statistical difference in driver culpability across different brands.

While I completely understand why the drivers are considered culpable for making risky or aggressive maneuvers. What I would be interested in is the circumstances that led them to making those maneuvers.

My own experience is that I only overtake (which I presume is considered risky?) when I'm behind a vehicle driving well below the speed that the road and weather conditions permit.

So while I am responsible for an incident that may occur due to my choice to overtake I do think consideration should be paid to what caused that manoeuvre.

What do you like about ligatures? I disable them straight away. To me it just seems to add an unnecessary level of complexity to the experience

People desperately trying to avoid snaps by any means possible?

There is that one episode where they go into intense detail about how the Internet functions. They even show it!

The fact she was on vacation is entirely irrelevant to the story. It's inclusion is solely to lead the reader to think it was her primary residence.

The newer FFNTs are way cooler though

Why would you assume that? That doesn't seem a particularly logical conclusion?

Once you've got a clear mind you should re-read the comments you're replying to. The only anger is your own, the only emotion is your own, the only ego is your own.

Everyone else is just toying with you for amusement. It's like watching a dog snapping at its own tail. You know you should probably help the poor soul out but at the same time you kinda want to see what happens.

I doubt reddit makes much revenue from traffic generated by search queries. I suspect People endlessly scrolling their feed are more likely to click ads

it matter if you're right

I obviously don't care what people think

If you don't care then why does it matter?

Dude. Calm down. You said something that people disagreed with, just accept that's the case and move on.

We've all had people disagree with us, doubling, tripling, quadrupling down on it achieves nothing.

The cynic in me immediately thinks this is so Facebook can further connect your activity to sell

As opposed to serving cold pasta sauce on dry pasta or fresh pasta straight from the fridge?

Does it still revolve around building roads or can cities finally thrive with alternative transport?

A whitelist defeats the decentralisation and openness of a defederated system.

I think you're mistaken in your assumption it would be easy to identify malicious instances. Bots are notoriously difficult to fight, every time you block one method another workaround will appear.

So, I take it your answer is no?

Have you considered that the issue could well be that the things you're posting just aren't particularly amusing?

You can only sit with people in your household. The others will need their own table

I never found Joe Wilkinson particularly entertaining - that was until his appearance on Taskmaster which was simply sublime.

I'd be interested to know the proportion of people who know how electronic waste can be recycled. And how often the average person visits their local recycling center.

I have dozens of items boxed up in need of disposal but I never find the time to research how, let alone making the journey to a recycling center