He is the public face of the government. Of course he didn't do everything by himself, good or bad. Everybody knows that already, it's a stupid point to make. He's chosen to take on the job of being his governments public face, and statements about government being directed at him personally is just part of the job.
Trump wasn't personally throwing children in jail, but when people talk about the border detentions that happened during his presidency, we still say Trump did it.
Obama didn't personally approve every drone strike, he was backed up by plenty of other politicians, but we still say Obama increased the drone strikes.
You know there's something about a villains motive being so small and pathetic that just makes it seem more real. Hardly anybody has any grand ideas about shaping the world, even those with the power to. Most billionaires are literally buying big boats and buildings instead of shaping nations. Destroying things because he can't handle rejection is just so much more human.
Go on Amazon and search for a "outdoors phone". I have one that is about that size and weighs a lot, but I can go a week between charges easily. I can play games with my headphones for 8 hours straight without needing to charge.
I stopped trying and I just bought a big bottle of vitamin C tablets. It's somehow easier for me to take one tablet a day than it is to eat one orange a week.
They last a lot longer if you do refrigerate them though. Particularly with soft flesh fruits like plums, that have about 12 hours of good ripeness before they start bletting if you leave them at room temperature.
"Like the fruit of the medlar, sooner rotten than ripe."
I didn't get that insinuation at all.
Do you see the same insinuations with the statement "Obama increased drone strikes"?
I'm sure you'd happily support the insinuation that trump was a dictator if something similar were said about him.