RoboRay @ RoboRay @kbin.social

*If someone can prove me wrong and show me my mistake in any thought or act

---

Read more

Posts

0

Comments

143

Joined

2 yr. ago

Lock her him up!

I use OnlyOffice, but certainly would not suggest it as an Outlook replacement.

Considering that none of the answers actually answer the actual question, why keep it up?

Irrational people behaving irrationally.

Someone always finds a way.

The typical surprise bill would still be a lot less than your monthly payment for the infinite searches option. You probably aren't going to unknowingly perform several thousand more searches than you normally do without noticing it.

Anyway, your other option is to scroll through infinite ads trying to find the few actual search results.

Pick your poison.

Turning off Discover is the first thing I do with a new phone. It's utterly worthless. In fact, it's worse than worthless because if I open Google it's because I want to search for something. Don't try to distract me while I'm busy.

You're not limited to a set amount of searches if you pick a cheaper Kagi plan... the plan is just for how many are pre-paid. You'd have to do six times the pre-paid number of searches on the $5 plan to get billed $25, so there's no point in paying $25 monthly unless you're actually doing thousands of searches every month.

But either way, there is no limit.

As a non-Mac user, I'm not even sure if "Mac-only" or "yet-another Chromium fork" makes it less interesting.

I actually move my Documents, Pictures and other important folders inside my Dropbox folder and symlink them back to their original locations

This gives me the same Docs, Pics, etc. folders synced on every computer.

A lot of companies won't employ technical writers, who exist to make good, thorough, complete and well-presented documentation... they rather assume their engineers can just write the docs.

And no, no they can't... very few engineers study the principles of effective communication. They may understand things, but they can't explain them.

We may have to start reading the manuals!

That's a number.

You have to start with a 40 billion dollar company if you want a billion dollar company using Musk's methods.

With a 3.5mm jack, you need power amplifiers in the source device to provide the amplified analog signal for sound reproduction. With USB headphones, you're just moving the digital-to-analog conversion and power amps to the end device.

You end up with the same power draw from the single battery, either way.

Well, if you ask a vague question, you get responses about the wrong thing.

Sorry, no idea about that. I assumed you had blurred it out in your screenshot.

Every word of that should be the new response copypasta.

Got it, my misunderstanding...

And I do agree with your added concern.

That’s great, right up until Ring unilaterally decides to...

Which is a completely different topic than the one I quoted. The article said that equipment owners shouldn't be able to provide their videos to the police without the police first getting a warrant, which is an utterly ridiculous position to take.

OBVIOUSLY the police should have a warrant to get the video without the equipment owner's permission, but that's not what the author said.