Not on my machine.
Or at least, I do everything humanly possible to limit it.
Either through:
Switching to FOSS alternatives
Custom patches applied to proprietary binaries.
Blocking network access for certain processes
I don't expect everyone to become a privacy expert though.
However I do believe systematic privacy is important, and that we should aim for better privacy laws to keep the intellectual property of the average user safe.
Now they can also train their gray area trained model (trained upon our Github projects without consolidating with us if it was alright to do so) further!
By spying on every command you type in your CLI, and phoning home to MS about it,
to train it further.
I guarantee you,
If you use it, you'll be their free training monkey.
And once they used you for free,
and the product improved enough,
they'll subscription charge you forever to make use of it.
Google software = Spyware with some features on top.
I hate any form of spyware.
I hate how they pampered it with a euphemism and called spy-ware "telemetry".
I hate how sheeple are sticking their head in the sand regarding the spy-ware a.k.a. "telemetry".
I hate how we still don't have enough laws protecting our digital privacy.
I hate how the world appears to be turning into a massive surveillance state...
Please come up for your rights for privacy,
by saying no to spy-ware.
Well, the post was about copilot,
so that's what my comment was about.
But I agree, fck all big-tech software.
If it's not produced by a non-profit as open source, then it's not worth your time.
(Due to anti-consumer practices, spy-ware/telemetry or vunerabilities to worry about)